Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32151259›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2020

Secular trends in testosterone- findings from a large state-mandate care provider.

Gabriel Chodick, Shdema Epstein, Varda Shalev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Testosterone deficiency and the aging male.International journal of impotence research · 2022
    Review
  17. The changing tide of human fertility.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriel ChodickSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Hodik_g@mac.org.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5189-8995
Shdema EpsteinSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Varda ShalevSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies from the US and Europe have shown a population-level decline in serum testosterone in men from 1970's to early 2000's. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study examining population-level decline in testosterone has been published in more recent years. The study objective was therefore to examine secular trends in testosterone levels among Israeli men in the first and second decades of the twenty-first century,

methodsAll incident total testosterone performed between1/2006 and 3/2019 among 102,334 male members of a large health organization.

resultsA significant (p < 0.001) and prominent trend of age-independent decline in the testosterone levels was recorded during the study period for most age groups.

conclusionsThere was a highly significant age-independent decline in total testosterone in the first and second decades of the twenty-first century. The decline was unlikely to be explained by increasing rates of obesity.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIsraelMaleMiddle AgedObesityTestosteroneYoung AdultTestosteroneIsraelSecular trendsTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID32151259
PMCPMC7063751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.