Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32151239›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

An analytical pipeline for identifying and mapping the integration sites of HIV and other retroviruses.

Daria W Wells, Shuang Guo, Wei Shao, Michael J Bale, John M Coffin, Stephen H Hughes, Xiaolin Wu

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daria W WellsCancer Research Technology Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, PO Box B, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Shuang GuoCancer Research Technology Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, PO Box B, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Wei ShaoAdvanced Biomedical Computational Science, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Michael J BaleHIV Dynamics and Replication Program, National Cancer Institute Frederick, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA.
John M CoffinDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Stephen H HughesHIV Dynamics and Replication Program, National Cancer Institute Frederick, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA.
Xiaolin WuCancer Research Technology Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, PO Box B, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA. forestwu@mail.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6432-1300
Leidos (United States) · USNational Institutes of Health · USTufts University · US

Funding

IntegraseZIABC011426 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HUGHES, STEPHEN H · 2012 to 2022
$14.0M
Retrovirus Evolution and CancerR35CA200421 · NCI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI COFFIN, JOHN M · 2016 to 2022
$6.5M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCI NIH HHS R35 CA200421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAll retroviruses, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), must integrate a DNA copy of their genomes into the genome of the infected host cell to replicate. Although integrated retroviral DNA, known as a provirus, can be found at many sites in the host genome, integration is not random. The adaption of linker-mediated PCR (LM-PCR) protocols for high-throughput integration site mapping, using randomly-sheared genomic DNA and Illumina paired-end sequencing, has dramatically increased the number of mapped integration sites. Analysis of samples from human donors has shown that there is clonal expansion of HIV infected cells and that clonal expansion makes an important contribution to HIV persistence. However, analysis of HIV integration sites in samples taken from patients requires extensive PCR amplification and high-throughput sequencing, which makes the methodology prone to certain specific artifacts.

resultsTo address the problems with artifacts, we use a comprehensive approach involving experimental procedures linked to a bioinformatics analysis pipeline. Using this combined approach, we are able to reduce the number of PCR/sequencing artifacts that arise and identify the ones that remain. Our streamlined workflow combines random cleavage of the DNA in the samples, end repair, and linker ligation in a single step. We provide guidance on primer and linker design that reduces some of the common artifacts. We also discuss how to identify and remove some of the common artifacts, including the products of PCR mispriming and PCR recombination, that have appeared in some published studies. Our improved bioinformatics pipeline rapidly parses the sequencing data and identifies bona fide integration sites in clonally expanded cells, producing an Excel-formatted report that can be used for additional data processing.

conclusionsWe provide a detailed protocol that reduces the prevalence of artifacts that arise in the analysis of retroviral integration site data generated from in vivo samples and a bioinformatics pipeline that is able to remove the artifacts that remain.

Indexed as

Virus IntegrationChromosome MappingComputational BiologyDNA, ViralGenome, HumanHIVHIV InfectionsHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionProvirusesSequence Analysis, DNADNA, ViralHIVIntegrationPatient samplesPCR misprimingPCR recombinationRetrovirus

Identifiers

PMID32151239
PMCPMC7063773
OpenAlexW3011365556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.