ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Mechanical, Team-Focused, Video-Reviewed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves Return of Spontaneous Circulation After Emergency Department Implementation.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Part 4: Systems of Care: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.Circulation · 2025Guideline
- An Advanced Cardiac Life Support Application Improves Performance during Simulated Cardiac Arrest.Applied clinical informatics · 2024Trial
- Factors Influencing the Maintenance of Advanced Life Support Competencies Among Critical Care Professionals: A Scoping Review.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Video Review of Cardiac Arrest: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Review
- Enhancing Resuscitation Performance: The Impact of Team Resource Management and In-Situ Simulation on Teamwork and Procedure Adherence.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
- A practical study on a stepwise simulation intervention guided by video review to improve the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the pediatric emergency department.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Discrepancies between physician review and algorithmic detection of the zoll rescuenet post-cardiac arrest case review.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- An Emergency Medical Services to Emergency Department Checklist for Handoff of Cardiac Arrest: A Modified Delphi Approach.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025Article
- Knowledge and training willingness toward cardiopulmonary resuscitation among healthcare professionals in a tertiary rehabilitation hospital: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Success of focused transthoracic echocardiography locations for cardiac visualization during cardiac arrest: A video-review analysis.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- The evaluation of video-assisted debriefing for improving performance in simulated medical student resuscitations.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- Application of Technology in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, a Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Prehospital transport and termination of resuscitation of cardiac arrest patients: A review of prehospital care protocols in the United States.Resuscitation plus · 2023Review
- Data-driven resuscitation training using pose estimation.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2023Article
- The Latest in Resuscitation Research: Highlights From the 2020 American Heart Association's Resuscitation Science Symposium.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Mechanical, Team-Focused, Video-Reviewed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves Return of Spontaneous Circulation After Emergency Department Implementation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Outcomes in cardiac arrest remain suboptimal. Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has not demonstrated clear clinical benefit; however, video review provides the capability to monitor CPR quality and provide constructive feedback to individuals and teams to improve their performance. The aim of our study was to evaluate cardiac arrest outcomes before and after initiation of a mechanical, team-focused, video-reviewed CPR intervention. Methods and Results In 2018, our emergency department began using mechanical CPR; a new team-focused strategy with nurse-led Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support; and biweekly, multidisciplinary video review of cardiac arrests. A revised approach to resuscitation was generated from a performance improvement session, and in situ simulation was used to disseminate our approach. The primary outcome of this study was the return of spontaneous circulation rate before and after our mechanical, team-focused, video-reviewed CPR intervention. Secondary outcomes included survival to admission and discharge. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used. The pre- and postintervention groups were similar at baseline. A total of 248 patients were included in our study (97 before and 151 after mechanical, team-focused, video-reviewed CPR). Return of spontaneous circulation was higher in the intervention group (41% versus 26%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.