Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32151155›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of plant biology2020

Prospects for Engineering Biophysical CO

Jessica H Hennacy, Martin C Jonikas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of plant biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. RBMP2 shapes specialized membranes for CObioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. SAGA1 and SAGA2 localize the starch sheath to the pyrenoid inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Architectural and biochemical advances in understanding microbial COThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. SAGA1 and SAGA2 localize the starch sheath to the pyrenoid inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica H HennacyDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA; email: jhennacy@princeton.edu, mjonikas@princeton.edu.
Martin C JonikasDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA; email: jhennacy@princeton.edu, mjonikas@princeton.edu.

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007388 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI CRISTEA, ILEANA M. · 1985 to 2022
$27.4M
Transforming our understanding of eukaryotic gene functions through chemical genetics in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiDP2GM119137 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI JONIKAS, MARTIN CASIMIR · 2015 to 2015
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM119137NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although cyanobacteria and algae represent a small fraction of the biomass of all primary producers, their photosynthetic activity accounts for roughly half of the daily CO

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideEmbryophytaEngineeringPhotosynthesisRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseCarbon DioxideRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylasecarboxysomeCO2 concentrating mechanismcrop yieldspyrenoidRubiscosynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID32151155
PMCPMC7845915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.