Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32151120›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2020

A novel urethra compression technique using Turkish continence device for male urinary incontinence

Öner Odabaş, Irem Gül Sancak, Yusuf Kasap, Zerrin Mahmut, Erkan Ölçücüoğlu, Sedat Taştemur, Neslihan Zengin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Öner OdabaşUrology Clinic, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-3776-0583
Irem Gül SancakSurgery Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-9108-8954
Yusuf KasapUrology Clinic, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-5313-2611
Zerrin MahmutSurgery Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-5313-2611
Erkan ÖlçücüoğluUrology Clinic, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-9101-5253
Sedat TaştemurUrology Clinic, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-0534-2520
Neslihan ZenginPathology Laboratory,Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-4912-005X
Bilkent University · TRAnkara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: The male sling operation and artificial urinary sphincter implantation are common methods for treating urinary incontinence. However, there are some drawbacks to these methods such as infection, urethral erosion, pain, inefficiency, and the technical difficulty of the operations. Here we describe a new device we have named the Turkish Continence Device (TCD) which has advantages over these other methods. The aim of this study was perform experiments with the TCD prototype in vivo and ex vivo to determine efficiency, convenience of implantation, and negative effects. Materials and methods: We implanted the prototype device in male goats and sheep, compressing the posterior urethra, and then fixed it by sutures on the lateral sides of the cavernosal bodies, bilaterally. Then we recorded urodynamic findings and performed urinary imaging. Additionally we measured urethral closure pressure ex vivo. Results: The balloon volume for efficient urethral closure pressure using the new device was under 1 mL. It compressed the urethra towards the corpus cavernosum perfectly, because the wings of the prototype device are fixed near the tunica of the cavernosal bodies on each side. Conclusion: A smaller device with smaller arms/wings would be efficient for obtaining enough pressure on the urethra. Additionally, the technique for implanting the device is very simple and would likely be learned quickly.

Indexed as

CathetersProstheses and ImplantsUrethraUrinary IncontinenceAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGoatsMaleProsthesis DesignProsthesis ImplantationSheepUrodynamicsexperimental studyMale urinary incontinencenovel compression techniquetreatmentTurkish Continence Device

Identifiers

PMID32151120
PMCPMC7491266
OpenAlexW3010722501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.