Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32151074›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Provincial Dietary Intake Study (PDIS): Energy and Macronutrient Intakes of Children in a Representative/Random Sample of 1-<10-Year-Old Children in Two Economically Active and Urbanized Provinces in South Africa.

Nelia P Steyn, Johanna H Nel, Sonia Malczyk, Linda Drummond, Marjanne Senekal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nelia P SteynDivision Human Nutrition, University of Cape Town, UCT Medical campus, Anzio Road, Anatomy Building, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
Johanna H NelDepartment of Logistics, Stellenbosch University, 7600 Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Sonia MalczykDivision Human Nutrition, University of Cape Town, UCT Medical campus, Anzio Road, Anatomy Building, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
Linda DrummondDivision Human Nutrition, University of Cape Town, UCT Medical campus, Anzio Road, Anatomy Building, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
Marjanne SenekalDivision Human Nutrition, University of Cape Town, UCT Medical campus, Anzio Road, Anatomy Building, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Cape Town · ZAStellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The double burden of malnutrition is still prevalent in South Africa, hence the importance of a dietary survey to identify risks of under- and over-nutrition. A multistage stratified cluster random sampling design was applied in two economically active provinces, Gauteng (GTG) (N = 733) and Western Cape (WC) (N = 593). Field workers completed questionnaires, and a 24 h recall with children taking part aged 1-<10-years (N = 1326). Important findings were that 71% and 74%, respectively, of 3-<6-year-olds and 6-<10-year-olds had an energy intake below the estimated energy requirement (EER), while 66% 1-<3-year-olds had intakes above the EER. The percentage of children with a total fat intake below recommended levels decreased as age increased ((51%, 40% and 5%) respectively, for the three age groups). Similarly, the percentage of those who had a total fat intake above the recommendation increased with increasing age (4%, 11% and 26%, respectively, for the three age groups). Saturated fat intake above 10%E was highest in the youngest and oldest children (33% and 32%, respectively). The percentage of children with a free sugars intake above 10%E was 47%, 48% and 52% respectively, and 98%-99% had a fibre intake that was less than recommended. Overall, the diet was not healthy, with the main food items being very refined, and the diet being high in salty snacks and sugary items, and low in fruit, vegetables and legumes.

Indexed as

DietEnergy IntakeNutrientsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleNutritional RequirementsSocioeconomic FactorsSouth AfricaUrban PopulationNutrientschildren 1–dietary intakesdouble burden of malnutritionenergymacronutrientsnutrition

Identifiers

PMID32151074
PMCPMC7084522
OpenAlexW3009695107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.