Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32150961›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Adolescents' Reactions to Adverts for Fast-Food and Confectionery Brands That are High in Fat, Salt, and/or Sugar (HFSS), and Possible Implications for Future Research and Regulation: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey of 11-19 Year Olds in the United Kingdom.

Nathan Critchlow, Jessica Newberry Le Vay, Anne Marie MacKintosh, Lucie Hooper, Christopher Thomas, Jyotsna Vohra

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan CritchlowInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
Jessica Newberry Le VayCancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London E20 1JQ, UK.
Anne Marie MacKintoshInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
Lucie HooperCancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London E20 1JQ, UK.
Christopher ThomasCancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London E20 1JQ, UK.
Jyotsna VohraCancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London E20 1JQ, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 23104Cancer Research UK C61042/A28892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence that marketing for foods high in fat, salt, and/or sugar (HFSS) has on adolescents extends beyond a dose-response relationship between exposure and consumption. It is also important to explore how marketing shapes or reinforces product/brand attitudes, and whether this varies by demography and Body Mass Index (BMI). To examine this, a cross-sectional survey was conducted with 11-19 year olds in the United Kingdom (

Indexed as

AdvertisingDietary SugarsFast FoodsSodium, DietaryAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDietary FatsFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTelevisionUnited KingdomYoung AdultDietary FatsDietary SugarsSodium, Dietaryadolescentsadvertisingfood policyHFSSjunk foodMarketingobesityoverweightreactionsregulation

Identifiers

PMID32150961
PMCPMC7084527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.