Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32150870›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Comparative Root Transcriptomics Provide Insights into Drought Adaptation Strategies in Chickpea (

Vijay Bhaskarla, Gaurav Zinta, Rebecca Ford, Mukesh Jain, Rajeev K Varshney, Nitin Mantri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Vijay BhaskarlaThe Pangenomics Group, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne 3083, Australia.
Gaurav ZintaShanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, Center of Excellence for Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5503-8618
Rebecca FordSchool of Natural Sciences, Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4192-0706
Mukesh JainSchool of Computational & Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India.
Rajeev K VarshneyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Hyderabad 502324, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4562-9131
Nitin MantriThe Pangenomics Group, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne 3083, Australia.
RMIT University · AUChinese Academy of Sciences · CNGriffith University · AUInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · INJawaharlal Nehru University · IN

Funding

Australia-India Strategic Research Fund GCF010013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought adversely affects crop production across the globe. The root system immensely contributes to water management and the adaptability of plants to drought stress. In this study, drought-induced phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of two contrasting chickpea (

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalGene Expression Regulation, PlantStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptomeCicerComputational BiologyDroughtsGene Expression ProfilingPlant ProteinsPlant RootsPlant Proteinsabiotic stresschickpeadroughtgene expressionhormonerootsignaling

Identifiers

PMID32150870
PMCPMC7084756
OpenAlexW3009504433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.