Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32150859›Full record

ArticlePolymers2020

Microscopic Structure of Swollen Hydrogels by Scanning Electron and Light Microscopies: Artifacts and Reality.

Zhansaya Kaberova, Evgeny Karpushkin, Martina Nevoralová, Miroslav Vetrík, Miroslav Šlouf, Miroslava Dušková-Smrčková

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Guidance on biomaterials for periodontal tissue regeneration: Fabrication methods, materials and biological considerations.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cryo-SEM Investigation ofBio-protocol · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhansaya KaberovaInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Heyrovského náměstí 2, 162 06 Praha 6, Prague, Czech Republic.
Evgeny KarpushkinDepartment of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Martina NevoralováInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Heyrovského náměstí 2, 162 06 Praha 6, Prague, Czech Republic.
Miroslav VetríkInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Heyrovského náměstí 2, 162 06 Praha 6, Prague, Czech Republic.
Miroslav ŠloufInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Heyrovského náměstí 2, 162 06 Praha 6, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1528-802X
Miroslava Dušková-SmrčkováInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Heyrovského náměstí 2, 162 06 Praha 6, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2684-9814
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry · CZLomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 17-08531STechnologická Agentura České Republiky TE01020118Technologická Agentura České Republiky TN01000008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exact knowledge of hydrogel microstructure, mainly its pore topology, is a key issue in hydrogel engineering. For visualization of the swollen hydrogels, the cryogenic or high vacuum scanning electron microscopies (cryo-SEM or HVSEM) are frequently used while the possibility of artifact-biased images is frequently underestimated. The major cause of artifacts is the formation of ice crystals upon freezing of the hydrated gel. Some porous hydrogels can be visualized with SEM without the danger of artifacts because the growing crystals are accommodated within already existing primary pores of the gel. In some non-porous hydrogels the secondary pores will also not be formed due to rigid network structure of gels that counteracts the crystal nucleation and growth. We have tested the limits of true reproduction of the hydrogel morphology imposed by the swelling degree and mechanical strength of gels by investigating a series of methacrylate hydrogels made by crosslinking polymerization of glycerol monomethacrylate and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate including their interpenetrating networks. The hydrogel morphology was studied using cryo-SEM, HVSEM, environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) and classical wide-field light microscopy (LM). The cryo-SEM and HVSEM yielded artifact-free micrographs for limited range of non-porous hydrogels and for macroporous gels. A true non-porous structure was observed free of artifacts only for hydrogels exhibiting relatively low swelling and high elastic modulus above 0.5 MPa, whereas for highly swollen and/or mechanically weak hydrogels the cryo-SEM/HVSEM experiments resulted in secondary porosity. In this contribution we present several cases of severe artifact formation in PHEMA and PGMA hydrogels during their visualization by cryo-SEM and HVSEM. We also put forward empirical correlation between hydrogel morphological and mechanical parameters and the occurrence and intensity of artifacts.

Indexed as

artifactshydrogellaser scanning confocal microscopymorphologyPGMAPHEMApoly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)poly(glycerol monomethacrylate)variable-pressure and environmental scanning electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID32150859
PMCPMC7182949
OpenAlexW3009500857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.