Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32150601›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2020

Interpretable and accurate prediction models for metagenomics data.

Edi Prifti, Yann Chevaleyre, Blaise Hanczar, Eugeni Belda, Antoine Danchin, Karine Clément, Jean-Daniel Zucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edi PriftiIRD, Sorbonne University, UMMISCO, 32 Avenue Henri Varagnat, F-93143 Bondy, France.
Yann ChevaleyreParis-Dauphine University, PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR 7243, LAMSADE, place du Mal. de Lattre de Tassigny, F-75016, Paris, France.
Blaise HanczarIBISC, University Paris-Saclay, University Evry, Evry, 23 Boulevard de France, F-91034, France.
Eugeni BeldaInstitute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, ICAN, Integromics, 91 Boulevard de l'Hopital, F-75013, Paris, France.
Antoine DanchinInstitut Cochin INSERM U1016-CNRS UMR8104-Université Paris Descartes, 24 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, F-75014, Paris, France.
Karine ClémentSorbonne University, INSERM, Nutrition and Obesities; Systemic Approach Research Unit (NutriOmics), 91 Boulevard de l'Hopital, F-75013, Paris, France.
Jean-Daniel ZuckerIRD, Sorbonne University, UMMISCO, 32 Avenue Henri Varagnat, F-93143 Bondy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobiome biomarker discovery for patient diagnosis, prognosis, and risk evaluation is attracting broad interest. Selected groups of microbial features provide signatures that characterize host disease states such as cancer or cardio-metabolic diseases. Yet, the current predictive models stemming from machine learning still behave as black boxes and seldom generalize well. Their interpretation is challenging for physicians and biologists, which makes them difficult to trust and use routinely in the physician-patient decision-making process. Novel methods that provide interpretability and biological insight are needed. Here, we introduce "predomics", an original machine learning approach inspired by microbial ecosystem interactions that is tailored for metagenomics data. It discovers accurate predictive signatures and provides unprecedented interpretability. The decision provided by the predictive model is based on a simple, yet powerful score computed by adding, subtracting, or dividing cumulative abundance of microbiome measurements.

resultsTested on >100 datasets, we demonstrate that predomics models are simple and highly interpretable. Even with such simplicity, they are at least as accurate as state-of-the-art methods. The family of best models, discovered during the learning process, offers the ability to distil biological information and to decipher the predictability signatures of the studied condition. In a proof-of-concept experiment, we successfully predicted body corpulence and metabolic improvement after bariatric surgery using pre-surgery microbiome data.

conclusionsPredomics is a new algorithm that helps in providing reliable and trustworthy diagnostic decisions in the microbiome field. Predomics is in accord with societal and legal requirements that plead for an explainable artificial intelligence approach in the medical field.

Indexed as

MetagenomeGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMetagenomicsModels, GeneticSupport Vector Machineinterpretable modelsmetagenomics biomarkersmicrobial ecosystemsprediction

Identifiers

PMID32150601
PMCPMC7062144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.