ArticleGigaScience2020
Interpretable and accurate prediction models for metagenomics data.
Article in GigaScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Overview of the Last 71 Years of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Content Analysis and Meta-analysis to Investigate the Topic and Scientific Evolution.Obesity surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Microbial Isolation and Cultivation: Progress and Challenges.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- The Progress of Gout Prediction Models Based on Multi-source Data.Current rheumatology reviews · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-based prediction of pathogen emergence and evolution in the world of synthetic biology.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Review
- An enhanced AlexNet-Based model for femoral bone tumor classification and diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of bone oncology · 2024Article
- Major depletion of insulin sensitivity-associated taxa in the gut microbiome of persons living with HIV controlled by antiretroviral drugs.BMC medical genomics · 2024Article
- Deep learning methods in metagenomics: a review.Microbial genomics · 2024Review
- Functional alterations and predictive capacity of gut microbiome in type 2 diabetes.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Microbial Agents in Avian Clinical Samples.Veterinary sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- Enhanced metagenomic deep learning for disease prediction and consistent signature recognition by restructured microbiome 2D representations.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Dietary Efficacy Evaluation by Applying a Prediction Model Using Clinical Fecal Microbiome Data of Colorectal Disease to a Controlled Animal Model from an Obesity Perspective.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Machine-learning algorithms for asthma, COPD, and lung cancer risk assessment using circulating microbial extracellular vesicle data and their application to assess dietary effects.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2022Article
- SeqScreen: accurate and sensitive functional screening of pathogenic sequences via ensemble learning.Genome biology · 2022Article
- In vivo, in vitro and in silico: an open space for the development of microbe-based applications of synthetic biology.Microbial biotechnology · 2022Article
- Learning sparse log-ratios for high-throughput sequencing data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- Article
- Explainable AI reveals changes in skin microbiome composition linked to phenotypic differences.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Gut microbiome, big data and machine learning to promote precision medicine for cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicrobiome biomarker discovery for patient diagnosis, prognosis, and risk evaluation is attracting broad interest. Selected groups of microbial features provide signatures that characterize host disease states such as cancer or cardio-metabolic diseases. Yet, the current predictive models stemming from machine learning still behave as black boxes and seldom generalize well. Their interpretation is challenging for physicians and biologists, which makes them difficult to trust and use routinely in the physician-patient decision-making process. Novel methods that provide interpretability and biological insight are needed. Here, we introduce "predomics", an original machine learning approach inspired by microbial ecosystem interactions that is tailored for metagenomics data. It discovers accurate predictive signatures and provides unprecedented interpretability. The decision provided by the predictive model is based on a simple, yet powerful score computed by adding, subtracting, or dividing cumulative abundance of microbiome measurements.
resultsTested on >100 datasets, we demonstrate that predomics models are simple and highly interpretable. Even with such simplicity, they are at least as accurate as state-of-the-art methods. The family of best models, discovered during the learning process, offers the ability to distil biological information and to decipher the predictability signatures of the studied condition. In a proof-of-concept experiment, we successfully predicted body corpulence and metabolic improvement after bariatric surgery using pre-surgery microbiome data.
conclusionsPredomics is a new algorithm that helps in providing reliable and trustworthy diagnostic decisions in the microbiome field. Predomics is in accord with societal and legal requirements that plead for an explainable artificial intelligence approach in the medical field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.