Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32150569›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Cue-dependent effects of VR experience on motion-in-depth sensitivity.

Jacqueline M Fulvio, Mohan Ji, Lowell Thompson, Ari Rosenberg, Bas Rokers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Single-Trial fMRI Decoding of 3D Motion with Stereoscopic and Perspective Cues.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Optimal Estimation of Local Motion-in-Depth with Naturalistic Stimuli.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Walking humans and running mice: perception and neural encoding of optic flow during self-motion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacqueline M FulvioDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0055-4308
Mohan JiDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Lowell ThompsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Ari RosenbergDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8606-2987
Bas RokersDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

WNPRC Supplemental Request for Nonhuman Primate Enclosures to Equip HIV/AIDS-Related Research FacilitiesP51OD011106 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinska · 2012 to 2026
$150.7M
Hierarchical cortical circuits implementing robust 3D visual perceptionR01EY029438 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Ari Rosenberg · 2018 to 2026
$3.8M
Neuroscience Training ProgramT32NS105602 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Ari Rosenberg · 2019 to 2026
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029438NIH HHS P51 OD011106NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS105602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual system exploits multiple signals, including monocular and binocular cues, to determine the motion of objects through depth. In the laboratory, sensitivity to different three-dimensional (3D) motion cues varies across observers and is often weak for binocular cues. However, laboratory assessments may reflect factors beyond inherent perceptual sensitivity. For example, the appearance of weak binocular sensitivity may relate to extensive prior experience with two-dimensional (2D) displays in which binocular cues are not informative. Here we evaluated the impact of experience on motion-in-depth (MID) sensitivity in a virtual reality (VR) environment. We tested a large cohort of observers who reported having no prior VR experience and found that binocular cue sensitivity was substantially weaker than monocular cue sensitivity. As expected, sensitivity was greater when monocular and binocular cues were presented together than in isolation. Surprisingly, the addition of motion parallax signals appeared to cause observers to rely almost exclusively on monocular cues. As observers gained experience in the VR task, sensitivity to monocular and binocular cues increased. Notably, most observers were unable to distinguish the direction of MID based on binocular cues above chance level when tested early in the experiment, whereas most showed statistically significant sensitivity to binocular cues when tested late in the experiment. This result suggests that observers may discount binocular cues when they are first encountered in a VR environment. Laboratory assessments may thus underestimate the sensitivity of inexperienced observers to MID, especially for binocular cues.

Indexed as

Virtual RealityCuesDepth PerceptionHumansMotion PerceptionVision, BinocularVision Disparity

Identifiers

PMID32150569
PMCPMC7062262
OpenAlexW3009735491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.