Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32150545›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Should I stay or should I go? Determinants of immediate and delayed movement responses of female red deer (Cervus elaphus) to drive hunts.

Agathe Chassagneux, Clément Calenge, Pascal Marchand, Emmanuelle Richard, Etienne Guillaumat, Eric Baubet, Sonia Saïd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Agathe ChassagneuxDirection de la Recherche et de l'Appui Scientifique-Unité Ongulés Sauvages, Office Français de la Biodiversité, Birieux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6265-710X
Clément CalengeDirection surveillance, évaluation, données-Unité données et appui méthodologique, Office Français de la Biodiversité, Le Perray en Yvelines, France.
Pascal MarchandDirection de la Recherche et de l'Appui Scientifique-Unité Ongulés Sauvages, Office Français de la Biodiversité, Birieux, France.
Emmanuelle RichardPôle Nature, Fondation François Sommer, Paris, France.
Etienne GuillaumatDirection de la chasse et de la forêt, Domaine National de Chambord, Chambord, France.
Eric BaubetDirection de la Recherche et de l'Appui Scientifique-Unité Ongulés Sauvages, Office Français de la Biodiversité, Birieux, France.
Sonia SaïdDirection de la Recherche et de l'Appui Scientifique-Unité Ongulés Sauvages, Office Français de la Biodiversité, Birieux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hunting can be used as a tool for wildlife management, through limitation of population densities and dissuading game from using sensitive areas. The success of these approaches requires in depth knowledge of prey movement. Indeed, movement decisions of game during hunting may affect the killing success of hunters as well as the subsequent location of surviving animals. We thus investigated red deer movement responses to drive hunts and their causal factors. We studied 34 hunting events in the National Estate of Chambord (France) and thereby provided a fine-scale characterization of the immediate and delayed movement responses of red deer to drive hunts. Red deer responded to drive hunts either by immediately fleeing the hunted area, or by initially remaining before ultimately fleeing after the hunters had departed. A few hours after the hunt, all individuals were located in distant areas (> 2 kilometres) from the hunted area. Immediate flight responses were less common when drive hunts occurred in areas with dense understorey. However, neither beater/dog densities nor site familiarity influenced the immediate flight decision. Following a drive hunt, red deer remained outside the hunted areas for periods twice as long compared to periods when no hunting occurred (34 hours vs. 17 hours). Such knowledge of game movement rates in response to drive hunts may help the development of informed management policy for hunted red deer populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalDeerFemaleMovementRemote Sensing TechnologySex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID32150545
PMCPMC7062277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.