Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32150462›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of radiology2020

Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler ultrasound, CT and MRI in Budd Chiari syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pankaj Gupta, Varun Bansal, Praveen Kumar-M, Saroj K Sinha, Jayanta Samanta, Harshal Mandavdhare, Vishal Sharma, Usha Dutta, Rakesh Kochhar

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. An Update on the Management of Budd-Chiari Syndrome.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pankaj GuptaDepartments of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Varun BansalDepartments of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Praveen Kumar-MPharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Saroj K SinhaGastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Jayanta SamantaGastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Harshal MandavdhareGastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Vishal SharmaGastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Usha DuttaGastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Rakesh KochharGastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of Doppler ultrasound, CT, and MRI in the diagnosis of Budd Chiari syndrome (BCS).

methodsWe performed a literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify articles reporting the diagnostic accuracy of Doppler ultrasound, CT, and MRI (either alone or in combination) for BCS using catheter venography or surgery as the reference standard. The quality of the included articles was assessed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

results11 studies were found eligible for inclusion. Pooled sensitivities and specificities of Doppler ultrasound were 89% [95% confidence interval (CI), 81-94%, I

conclusionDoppler ultrasound, CT and MRI had high overall diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis of BCS, but substantial heterogeneity was found. Prospective studies are needed to investigate diagnostic performance of these imaging modalities. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: MRI and CT have the highest meta-analytic sensitivity and specificity, respectively for the diagnosis of BCS. Also, MRI has the highest area under curve for the diagnosis of BCS.

Indexed as

Budd-Chiari SyndromeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonography, Doppler

Identifiers

PMID32150462
PMCPMC7217562
OpenAlexW3010459779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.