Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32150296›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2020

A Bayesian seamless phase I-II trial design with two stages for cancer clinical trials with drug combinations.

José L Jiménez, Sungjin Kim, Mourad Tighiouart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Combining cytotoxic agents with continuous dose levels in seamless phase I-II clinical trials.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

José L JiménezBiostatistical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Novartis Pharma A.G., Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8809-2717
Sungjin KimBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mourad TighiouartBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis: Biology and TargetingP01CA098912 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CHUNG, LELAND W.K. · 2003 to 2019
$24.0M
UCLA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR033176 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2011 to 2011
$15.5M
Use of Rapamycin for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Patients with Noonan Syndrome with Multiple Lentigines (NSML)ZIATR000012 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI OTTINGER, ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2019
$8.2M
Design of Cancer Phase I/II Clinical Trials Using Drug Combinations of Cytotoxic and Biologic AgentsR01CA188480 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI TIGHIOUART, MOURAD · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health R01CA188480-01A1H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 633567NCATS NIH HHS 2 P01 CA09891NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR00012NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NCI NIH HHS P01 CA098912NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188480NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR03317NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of drug combinations in clinical trials is increasingly common during the last years since a more favorable therapeutic response may be obtained by combining drugs. In phase I clinical trials, most of the existing methodology recommends a one unique dose combination as "optimal," which may result in a subsequent failed phase II clinical trial since other dose combinations may present higher treatment efficacy for the same level of toxicity. We are particularly interested in the setting where it is necessary to wait a few cycles of therapy to observe an efficacy outcome and the phase I and II population of patients are different with respect to treatment efficacy. Under these circumstances, it is common practice to implement two-stage designs where a set of maximum tolerated dose combinations is selected in a first stage, and then studied in a second stage for treatment efficacy. In this article we present a new two-stage design for early phase clinical trials with drug combinations. In the first stage, binary toxicity data is used to guide the dose escalation and set the maximum tolerated dose combinations. In the second stage, we take the set of maximum tolerated dose combinations recommended from the first stage, which remains fixed along the entire second stage, and through adaptive randomization, we allocate subsequent cohorts of patients in dose combinations that are likely to have high posterior median time to progression. The methodology is assessed with extensive simulations and exemplified with a real trial.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsResearch DesignAntineoplastic AgentsBayes TheoremClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CombinationsHumansAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Combinationsadaptive randomizationcontinuous dosesdrug combinationsescalation with overdose controltwo-stage designs

Identifiers

PMID32150296
PMCPMC7483235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.