ArticleMedicine2020
Clinical nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with cerebral anaplastic gliomas.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of Cancer-Specific Survival of Brainstem Glioma in Children Based on Risk Stratification Model.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to develop an effective nomogram for predicting the overall survival (OS) of patients with cerebral anaplastic glioma (AG).This study included 1939 patients diagnosed with AG between 1973 and 2013 who were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, histology, tumor site, marital status, radiotherapy, and surgery were independent prognostic factors and, thus, these factors were selected to build a clinical nomogram. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and a calibration curve were formulated to evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the nomogram using bootstrapping.A nomogram was developed to predict 5- and 9-year OS rates based on 6 independent prognostic factors identified in the training set: age, tumor site, marital status, histology, radiotherapy, and surgery (P < .05). The Harrell's concordance index values of the training and validation sets were 0.776 (0.759-0.793) and 0.766 (0.739-0.792), respectively. The calibration curve exhibited good consistency with the actual observation curve in both sets.Although the prognostic value of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification has been validated, we developed a novel nomogram based on readily available clinical variables in terms of demographic data, therapeutic modalities, and tumor characteristics to predict the survival of AG patients. When used in combination with the WHO classification system, this clinical nomogram can aid clinicians in making individualized predictions of AG patient survival and improving treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.