Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32150086›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2020

Dose-response association of resting heart rate and hypertension in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Lijun Shen, Yuming Wang, Xuesong Jiang, Yongcheng Ren, Chengyi Han, Yongguang Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. High Heart Rate and Hypertension: Two Intertwined Cardiovascular Risk Factors.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lijun ShenHenan Provincial Peoples Hospital, Zhengzhou.
Yuming WangHenan Provincial Peoples Hospital, Zhengzhou.
Xuesong JiangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of CM, Zhengzhou.
Yongcheng RenHuanghuai University, Zhumadian, Henan, China.
Chengyi HanThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of CM, Zhengzhou.
Yongguang YangHenan Provincial Peoples Hospital, Zhengzhou.
Henan Provincial People's Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Henan University · CNHuanghuai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association of resting heart rate (RHR) and hypertension in adults is unclear. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of cohort studies to clarify the association.

methodsWe searched PubMed and Embase from their inception to November 3, 2017, for published articles. We used a random effects model to combine study-specific relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used restricted cubic spline functions to assess the dose-response relationship.

resultsNine cohort articles (12 independent studies) with 79,399 individuals and more than 26,380 incident cases of hypertension were included. The summary RR for hypertension was 1.09 (95% CI: 1.06-1.13) with each 10 bpm increment in RHR. The cubic spline model suggested that when compared with 55.5 beats per minute, the risk of hypertension significantly increased with increasing levels of RHR (Pnonlinearity = 0.059).

conclusionWe found a linear dose-response association between RHR and incident hypertension in adults.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugAdultCohort StudiesHeart RateHeart Rate DeterminationHumansHypertensionRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32150086
PMCPMC7478507
OpenAlexW3012117437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.