Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32150068›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2020

Effect of ureteral calculus in outpatients receiving semirigid ureteroscope laser lithotripsy.

Chen-Pang Hou, Yu-Hsiang Lin, Horng-Heng Juang, Phei-Lang Chang, Chien-Lun Chen, Pei-Shan Yang, Chen-Che Lee, Ke-Hung Tsui

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chen-Pang HouDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at linkou.
Yu-Hsiang LinDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at linkou.
Horng-Heng JuangDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at linkou.
Phei-Lang ChangDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at linkou.
Chien-Lun ChenDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at linkou.
Pei-Shan YangDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at linkou.
Chen-Che LeeDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at linkou.
Ke-Hung TsuiDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at linkou.
Indiana University School of MedicineChang Gung University · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surgical outcomes of patients with single ureteral stones who had undergone ureteroscopic Holmium laser lithotripsy as outpatients and compare them with those of patients who had received the same procedure as inpatients. Records were obtained from January 2012 to December 2016 for selected patients who had undergone the above mentioned procedure at our institution. Patients were excluded if their ECOG performance status was ≥2, presented with multiple stones or concomitant renal stones, had histories of cancer or congenital urinary system abnormalities, or had undergone urinary system reconstruction surgery. Patients could decide whether to receive the procedure as an outpatient or inpatient. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Patients preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were recorded. The clinical results, such as urinary tract infection, analgesic requirement, rate of returning to the emergency room, stone clearance, surgical complications, and medical expenditure for the treatment courses were analyzed and compared between the 2 cohorts. In total, 303 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 119 patients decided to receive ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy as outpatients, whereas 184 decided to be inpatients. The outpatient cohort was younger (P < .001), had smaller stone diameters (P < .001), and fewer comorbidity factors (P = .038). Patients with a history of stone manipulation favored receiving the procedure under admission (P < .001). After 1:1 propensity score matching, no significant differences were discovered between the cohorts with regard to operative time, rate of lithotripsy failure, and operative complications. Furthermore, rates of stone clearance, post-op urinary tract infection, analgesic requirement, and returning to the emergency room were comparable between the 2 groups. However, the medical expenditure was significantly lower in the outpatient cohort (P < .001). Our data revealed that outpatient ureteroscopic lithotripsy with a Holmium laser was more economical compared with the inpatient group and achieved favorable outcomes for patients with a single ureteral stone.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansLithotripsy, LaserMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeUreteral CalculiUreteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID32150068
PMCPMC7478698
OpenAlexW3010865299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.