Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32150051›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Increased risk of dementia after distal radius, hip, and spine fractures.

So Young Kim, Joon Kyu Lee, Jae-Sung Lim, Bumjung Park, Hyo Geun Choi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Circulating neurodegenerative brain injury markers and hip fracture and fall hospitalizations: the Cardiovascular Health Study.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

So Young KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University.
Joon Kyu LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital.
Jae-Sung LimDepartment of Neurology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Bumjung ParkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery.
Hyo Geun ChoiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery.
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRCHA University Bundang Medical Center · KRHallym University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of dementia after distal radius, hip, and spine fractures.Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort were collected for the population ≥ 60 years of age from 2002 to 2013. A total of 10,387 individuals with dementia were matched for age, sex, income, region of residence, and history of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia with 41,548 individuals comprising the control group. Previous histories of distal radius, hip, and spine fractures were evaluated in both the dementia and control groups. Using ICD-10 codes, dementia (G30 and F00) and distal radius (S525), hip (S720, S721, and S722), and spine (S220 and S320) fractures were investigated. The crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of dementia in distal radius, hip, and spine fracture patients were analyzed using conditional logistic regression analyses. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to age, sex and region of residence.The adjusted ORs for dementia were higher in the distal radius, hip, and spine fracture group than in the non-fracture group (adjusted OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.10 -1.37, P < .001 for distal radius fracture; adjusted OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.48 - 1.83, P < .001 for hip fracture; adjusted OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.22 - 1.41, P < .001 for spine fracture). The results in subgroup analyses according to age, sex and region of residence were consistent.Distal radius, hip, and spine fractures increase the risk of dementia.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCohort StudiesDementiaFemaleFractures, BoneHealth Services for the AgedHip FracturesHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioOsteoporotic FracturesRadius Fractures

Identifiers

PMID32150051
PMCPMC7478383
OpenAlexW3011989515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.