Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32149955›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2020

Five Waves of an Online HIV Self-Test Giveaway in New York City, 2015 to 2018.

Zoe R Edelstein, Amanda Wahnich, Lawrence J Purpura, Paul M Salcuni, Benjamin W Tsoi, Paul H Kobrak, Paul A Santos, Adriana Andaluz, Jennifer H MacGregor, Jennifer D M Matsuki and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Accelerating Human Immunodeficiency Virus Self-Testing in the United States: A Call to Action.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zoe R EdelsteinFrom the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens.
Amanda WahnichFrom the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens.
Lawrence J Purpura
Paul M SalcuniFrom the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens.
Benjamin W TsoiFrom the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens.
Paul H KobrakFrom the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens.
Paul A SantosFrom the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens.
Adriana AndaluzFrom the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens.
Jennifer H MacGregorFrom the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens.
Jennifer D M MatsukiFrom the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens.
David A KatzDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Demetre C DaskalakisFrom the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens.
Julie E Myers
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene · USICAP Global HealthUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Global HIV Implementation Science Research Training Grant RenewalT32AI114398 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Yael R Hirsch-Moverman · 2014 to 2026
$4.1M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI114398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV self-tests increase HIV status awareness by providing convenience and privacy, although cost and access may limit use. Since 2015, the New York City (NYC) Health Department has conducted 5 waves of an online Home Test Giveaway.

methodsWe recruited adult cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender and gender-nonconforming (TGNC) individuals who had sex with men, who were living in NYC, not previously HIV diagnosed, and using paid digital advertisements (4-8 weeks per wave). Eligible respondents were e-mailed a code to redeem on the manufacturer's website for a free HIV self-test and an online follow-up survey ~2 months later. For key process and outcome measures, we present means across 5 waves.

resultsAcross the 5 waves of Home Test Giveaway, there were 28,921 responses to the eligibility questionnaire: 17,383 were eligible, 12,182 redeemed a code for a free HIV self-test, and 7935 responded to the follow-up survey (46% of eligible responses). Among eligible responses, approximately half were Latino/a (mean, 32%) or non-Latino/a, black (mean, 17%). Mean report of never testing before was 16%. Among 5903 follow-up survey responses who reported test use, 32 reported reactive results with no known previous diagnosis (0.54%), of whom 78% reported receiving confirmatory testing. Report of likelihood of recommending the Home Test Giveaway to friends was high (mean, 96%).

conclusionsWe recruited diverse NYC MSM and TGNC and distributed a large number of HIV self-tests to them. Among respondents who reported newly reactive tests, the majority reported confirmatory testing. This seems to be one acceptable way to reach MSM and TGNC for HIV testing, including those who have never tested before.

Indexed as

AdultAIDS SerodiagnosisFemaleHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningNew York CityReagent Kits, DiagnosticSexual and Gender MinoritiesTransgender PersonsReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID32149955
PMCPMC8020598
OpenAlexW3011167758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.