Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32149924›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Perception of Child-Directed Versus Adult-Directed Emotional Speech in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users.

Karen Chan Barrett, Monita Chatterjee, Meredith T Caldwell, Mickael L D Deroche, Patpong Jiradejvong, Aditya M Kulkarni, Charles J Limb

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05486637 (Perception and Production of Emotional Prosody With Cochlear Implants), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05486637 early_phase1recruitingnot on this map

Perception and Production of Emotional Prosody With Cochlear Implants

TypeinterventionalSponsorFather Flanagan's Boys' HomeRan2022 to 2027Enrolled255ConditionsCochlear Hearing LossArmsPerception of acoustic cues to emotion, Production of acoustic cues to emotion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen Chan BarrettDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Monita ChatterjeeAuditory Prostheses and Perception Lab, Center for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Meredith T CaldwellVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Mickael L D DerocheDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Patpong JiradejvongDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Aditya M KulkarniAuditory Prostheses and Perception Lab, Center for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Charles J LimbDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Boys Town National Research Hospital · USWeatherford College · USConcordia University · CAUniversity of California, San Francisco · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

The Impact of Mild Hearing Loss on Auditory Perception in Complex EnvironmentsP20GM109023 · NIGMS · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI LEIBOLD, LORI J. · 2014 to 2023
$23.4M
Cochlear-Implanted Children's Use of Acoustic Cues in Prosody and Lexical Tones (5R01DC014233-03)R01DC014233 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI CHATTERJEE, MONITA · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014233NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCochlear implants (CIs) are remarkable in allowing individuals with severe to profound hearing loss to perceive speech. Despite these gains in speech understanding, however, CI users often struggle to perceive elements such as vocal emotion and prosody, as CIs are unable to transmit the spectro-temporal detail needed to decode affective cues. This issue becomes particularly important for children with CIs, but little is known about their emotional development. In a previous study, pediatric CI users showed deficits in voice emotion recognition with child-directed stimuli featuring exaggerated prosody. However, the large intersubject variability and differential developmental trajectory known in this population incited us to question the extent to which exaggerated prosody would facilitate performance in this task. Thus, the authors revisited the question with both adult-directed and child-directed stimuli.

designVocal emotion recognition was measured using both child-directed (CDS) and adult-directed (ADS) speech conditions. Pediatric CI users, aged 7-19 years old, with no cognitive or visual impairments and who communicated through oral communication with English as the primary language participated in the experiment (n = 27). Stimuli comprised 12 sentences selected from the HINT database. The sentences were spoken by male and female talkers in a CDS or ADS manner, in each of the five target emotions (happy, sad, neutral, scared, and angry). The chosen sentences were semantically emotion-neutral. Percent correct emotion recognition scores were analyzed for each participant in each condition (CDS vs. ADS). Children also completed cognitive tests of nonverbal IQ and receptive vocabulary, while parents completed questionnaires of CI and hearing history. It was predicted that the reduced prosodic variations found in the ADS condition would result in lower vocal emotion recognition scores compared with the CDS condition. Moreover, it was hypothesized that cognitive factors, perceptual sensitivity to complex pitch changes, and elements of each child's hearing history may serve as predictors of performance on vocal emotion recognition.

resultsConsistent with our hypothesis, pediatric CI users scored higher on CDS compared with ADS speech stimuli, suggesting that speaking with an exaggerated prosody-akin to "motherese"-may be a viable way to convey emotional content. Significant talker effects were also observed in that higher scores were found for the female talker for both conditions. Multiple regression analysis showed that nonverbal IQ was a significant predictor of CDS emotion recognition scores while Years using CI was a significant predictor of ADS scores. Confusion matrix analyses revealed a dependence of results on specific emotions; for the CDS condition's female talker, participants had high sensitivity (d' scores) to happy and low sensitivity to the neutral sentences while for the ADS condition, low sensitivity was found for the scared sentences.

conclusionsIn general, participants had higher vocal emotion recognition to the CDS condition which also had more variability in pitch and intensity and thus more exaggerated prosody, in comparison to the ADS condition. Results suggest that pediatric CI users struggle with vocal emotion perception in general, particularly to adult-directed speech. The authors believe these results have broad implications for understanding how CI users perceive emotions both from an auditory communication standpoint and a socio-developmental perspective.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionAdolescentAdultChildEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleSpeechYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32149924
PMCPMC8323060
OpenAlexW3010965170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.