Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32149708›Full record

ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2021

Comparison of acute thrombogenicity and albumin adsorption in three different durable polymer coronary drug-eluting stents.

Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Matthew Kutyna, Sho Torii, Qi Cheng, Atsushi Sakamoto, Liang Guo, Anne Cornelissen, Laura E L Perkins, Syed F Hossainy, Stephen D Pacetti and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Durable-polymer versus biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents in acute coronary syndromes: three-year outcomes of the HOST REDUCE POLYTECH RCT Trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroyuki JinnouchiCVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Matthew Kutyna
Sho Torii
Qi Cheng
Atsushi Sakamoto
Liang Guo
Anne Cornelissen
Laura E L Perkins
Syed F Hossainy
Stephen D Pacetti
Frank D Kolodgie
Renu Virmani
Aloke V Finn
CVPath Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relative thrombogenicity and albumin adsorption and retention of different durable polymers used in coronary stents has not been tested.

aimsThis study sought to compare the thromboresistance and albumin binding capacity of different durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DES) using dedicated preclinical and in vitro models.

methodsIn an ex vivo swine arteriovenous shunt model, a fluoropolymer everolimus-eluting stent (FP-EES) (n=14) was compared with two durable polymer DES, the BioLinx polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent (BL-ZES) (n=9) and a CarboSil elastomer polymer-coated ridaforolimus-eluting stent (EP-RES) (n=6), and bare metal stents (BMS) (n=10). Stents underwent immunostaining using a cocktail of antiplatelet antibodies and a marker for inflammation and were then evaluated by confocal microscopy (CM). Albumin retention was assessed using a flow loop model with labelled human serum albumin (FP-EES [n=8], BL-ZES [n=4], EP-RES [n=4], and BMS [n=7]), and scanned by CM.

resultsThe area of platelet adherence (normalised to total stent surface area) was lower in the order FP-EES (9.8%), BL-ZES (32.7%), EP-RES (87.6%) and BMS (202.0%), and inflammatory cell density was least for FP-EES <BL-ZES <EP-RES <BMS. Although nearly full coverage by albumin binding was shown for all durable polymer DES, FP-EES showed significantly greater intensity of albumin as compared to BL-ZES, EP-RES and BMS (FP-EES 79.0%; BL-ZES 13.2%; EP-RES 6.1%; BMS 1.5%).

conclusionsThese results suggest that thromboresistance and albumin retention vary by polymer type and that these differences might result in different suitability for short-term dual antiplatelet therapy.

Indexed as

Drug-Eluting StentsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAdsorptionAlbuminsAnimalsEverolimusPolymersProsthesis DesignStentsSwineTreatment OutcomeAlbuminsEverolimusPolymers

Identifiers

PMID32149708
PMCPMC9725074
OpenAlexW3012092449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.