Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32149029›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Tall

Christian Wehenkel, Samantha Del Rocío Mariscal-Lucero, M Socorro González-Elizondo, Víctor A Aguirre-Galindo, Matthias Fladung, Carlos A López-Sánchez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Graft survival ofPeerJ · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian WehenkelInstituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico.
Samantha Del Rocío Mariscal-LuceroInstituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico.
M Socorro González-ElizondoCIIDIR Durango, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Durango, Mexico.
Víctor A Aguirre-GalindoInstituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico.
Matthias FladungThünen-Institute of Forest Genetics, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Carlos A López-SánchezDepartment of Organisms and Systems Biology, University of Oviedo, Polytechnic School of Mieres, Asturias, Spain.
Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango · MXInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MXTecnológico Nacional de México · MXUniversidad de Oviedo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

context

aimsWe aimed to determine the degree of hybridization between

methodsAFLP molecular markers from samples of 171 trees across five populations were analyzed with STRUCTURE and NewHybrids software to determine the degree of introgressive hybridization. The accuracy of STRUCTURE and NewHybrids in detecting hybrids was quantified using the software Hybridlab 1.0. Morphological analysis of 131 samples from two populations of

resultsHybridization between

conclusionsThis is the first report of hybrid vigour (heterosis) in Mexican pines. Information about hybridization and introgression is essential for developing effective future breeding programs, successful establishment of plantations and management of natural forest stands. Understanding how natural hybridization may influence the evolution and adaptation of pines to climate change is a cornerstone to sustainable forest management including adaptive silviculture.

Indexed as

Adaptive silvicultureAFLPAustralesInterspecific hybridsMonitoringNewHybridsRandom ForestSTRUCTURETree breedingTree species

Identifiers

PMID32149029
PMCPMC7049253
OpenAlexW3007469688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.