Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32149014›Full record

ArticleTremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)2020

High-dose Botulinum Toxin Therapy: Safety, Benefit, and Endurance of Efficacy.

Shannon Y Chiu, Bhavana Patel, Matthew R Burns, Joseph Legacy, Aparna Wagle Shukla, Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora, Wissam Deeb, Irene A Malaty

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shannon Y ChiuDepartment of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Bhavana PatelDepartment of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Matthew R BurnsDepartment of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Joseph LegacyDepartment of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Aparna Wagle ShuklaDepartment of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Adolfo Ramirez-ZamoraDepartment of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Wissam DeebDepartment of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Irene A MalatyDepartment of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Botulinum neurotoxin therapy (BoNT) is a powerful tool for treating many neurologic disorders. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved maximum onabotulinum toxin A (OnaA) dose is 400 units (U) per visit, but higher doses are commonly necessary, particularly when treating multiple body regions. Methods: We collected demographics, OnaA dose, body regions injected and indications, patient-reported efficacy via 7-point Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGIS), and duration of benefit. Results: Sixty-eight patients were identified receiving OnaA >400 U/session. Dystonia (n = 44) and spasticity (n = 24) were the most common indications for high-dose OnaA. Mean duration of benefit was 9 weeks (standard deviation [SD] 3). More than 70% of patients self-reported "very much improved" or "much improved" at 6 month, 1 year, and last visit. No serious adverse effects were reported. Discussion: The majority of patients tolerated >400 U OnaA with continued benefit. OnaA doses >400 U may be safe and effective in appropriate patients.

Indexed as

AgedBotulinum Toxins, Type ADystoniaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle SpasticityNeuromuscular AgentsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agentsonabotulinum toxin ABotulinum toxindystoniaonabotulinum toxin Aspasticity

Identifiers

PMID32149014
PMCPMC7052428
OpenAlexW3012895796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.