ReviewF1000Research2020
Jump around: transposons in and out of the laboratory.
Review in F1000Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- LINE-1 retrotransposons: Multifaceted functions and regulatory mechanisms in health and disease.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Review
- Genomic Instability Evolutionary Footprints on Human Health: Driving Forces or Side Effects?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Acquisition of new function through gene duplication in the metallocarboxypeptidase family.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Stochastic Effects in Retrotransposon Dynamics Revealed by Modeling under Competition for Cellular Resources.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Dynamism of Transposon Methylation for Plant Development and Stress Adaptation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Idiopathic Infertility as a Feature of Genome Instability.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Nonviral genome engineering of natural killer cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since Barbara McClintock's groundbreaking discovery of mobile DNA sequences some 70 years ago, transposable elements have come to be recognized as important mutagenic agents impacting genome composition, genome evolution, and human health. Transposable elements are a major constituent of prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes, and the transposition mechanisms enabling transposon proliferation over evolutionary time remain engaging topics for study, suggesting complex interactions with the host, both antagonistic and mutualistic. The impact of transposition is profound, as over 100 human heritable diseases have been attributed to transposon insertions. Transposition can be highly mutagenic, perturbing genome integrity and gene expression in a wide range of organisms. This mutagenic potential has been exploited in the laboratory, where transposons have long been utilized for phenotypic screening and the generation of defined mutant libraries. More recently, barcoding applications and methods for RNA-directed transposition are being used towards new phenotypic screens and studies relevant for gene therapy. Thus, transposable elements are significant in affecting biology both
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.