Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32148548›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2020

Functional MRI Investigation of Ultrasound Stimulation at ST 36.

Yarui Wei, Ling Mei, Xiaojing Long, Xiaoxiao Wang, Yanjun Diao, Benedictor A Nguchu, Sheng Hu, Yanming Wang, Haibo Yu, Bensheng Qiu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yarui WeiCenters for Biomedical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China.
Ling MeiShenzhen Key Laboratory for MRI, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Xiaojing LongShenzhen Key Laboratory for MRI, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4455-7831
Xiaoxiao WangCenters for Biomedical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China.
Yanjun DiaoShenzhen Key Laboratory for MRI, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Benedictor A NguchuCenters for Biomedical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China.
Sheng HuCenters for Biomedical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China.
Yanming WangCenters for Biomedical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China.
Haibo YuShenzhen Key Laboratory for MRI, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Bensheng QiuCenters for Biomedical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2987-7378
University of Science and Technology of China · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical and experimental data suggest that ultrasound stimulation (US) at acupoints can produce similar effective treatment compared to manual acupuncture (MA). Although the brain activation to MA at acupoints is investigated by numerous studies, the brain activation to US at acupoints remains unclear.

methodsIn the present work, we employed task state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore the human brain's activation to US and MA at ST 36 (

resultsBoth US and MA at ST 36 produced activations in somatosensory and limbic/paralimbic regions (postcentral gyrus, insula, middle prefrontal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex). Only US at ST 36 produced a significant signal increase in the inferior parietal lobule and decrease in the posterior cingulate cortex, whereas MA at ST 36 produced a significant signal increase in the lentiform nucleus and cerebellum.

conclusionsOur results indicate that US may be a possible noninvasive alternative method to MA due to its similar activation patterns.

Identifiers

PMID32148548
PMCPMC7056998
OpenAlexW3008686426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.