Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32148537›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2020

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial Testing the Efficacy and Safety of Pterygopalatine Fossa Puncture Using One Acupuncture Needle for Moderate-to-Severe Persistent Allergic Rhinitis.

Lu Zhang, Lei Jiang, Kai Cheng, Jian-Hua Fu, Shen Jian-Wu, Ke-Jian Wang, Yu-Juan Song, Xian-Zhong Meng, Zhi-Xian Xu, Li-He Chen and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lu Zhang *Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Caochang Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100091, China.
Lei Jiang *Rehabilitation Department, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, Hannover 30625, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0786-8729
Kai ChengBeijing Dacheng Acupuncture Hospital, No. 39 Yuanda Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100097, China.
Jian-Hua FuXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Caochang Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100091, China.
Shen Jian-WuXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Caochang Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100091, China.
Ke-Jian WangXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Caochang Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100091, China.
Yu-Juan SongRehabilitation Department, Longhua District Central Hospital, Guanlan Avenue No. 187, Shenzhen 518110, Guangdong, China.
Xian-Zhong MengRehabilitation Department, Pudong New Area People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Soth Chuanhuan Rd. 490, Shanghai 210200, China.
Zhi-Xian XuXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Caochang Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100091, China.
Li-He ChenXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Caochang Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100091, China.
Meng-Meng GuoXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Caochang Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100091, China.
Li-Juan ZhangXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Caochang Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100091, China.
Li-Li ZhangXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Caochang Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100091, China.
Da-Zhuo ShiXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Caochang Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100091, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6416-435X
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNBeijing Haidian Hospital · CNLonggang Central Hospital · CNMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of pterygopalatine fossa puncture using one acupuncture needle inserted through the temporal fossa (intervention) and Chinese verum acupuncture (VA) in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic rhinitis.

methodsThe patients were randomized to an intervention group receiving pterygopalatine fossa puncture with one acupuncture needle for 4 weeks (once or twice weekly, 4-8 sessions in total, with a second course performed if required) or to a control group receiving individualized VA for 4 weeks (twice weekly, eight sessions in total). Patients were followed up 4 weeks later.

resultsNinety-six participants were assigned to intervention (

conclusionsPterygopalatine fossa puncture using one acupuncture needle resulted in a shorter time to onset of effect, a longer duration of effectiveness, and less clinical waiting time when compared with VA. Though the significant differences for TNSS and TNNSS were shown within intervention and VA groups, there were no differences between the two groups. Although the rate of subcutaneous bleeding was low, these adverse events may influence patient compliance. This trial is registered with ISRCTN21980724.

Identifiers

PMID32148537
PMCPMC7053449
OpenAlexW3008087324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.