Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32148359›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteomics & bioinformatics2019

Standardizing Proteomics Workflow for Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Technical and Statistical Considerations.

Sudhir Srivastava, Michael Merchant, Anil Rai, Shesh N Rai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteomics & bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dioxin-like and non-dioxin-like PCBs differentially regulate the hepatic proteome and modify diet-induced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease severity.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sudhir SrivastavaCentre for Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Michael MerchantDepartment of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States of America.
Anil RaiCentre for Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Shesh N RaiDepartment of Bioinformatics & Biostatistics, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States of America.

Funding

Role of oxidized linoleic acid metabolites in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver diseaseP20GM113226 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI GHARE, SMITA S · 2016 to 2025
$24.1M
Superfund Training CoreP42ES023716 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI FORTNER, JOHN · 2017 to 2025
$18.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES023716NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM113226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe quantitative measurements based on liquid chromatography (LC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) often suffer from the problem of missing values and data heterogeneity from technical variability. We considered a proteomics data set generated from human kidney biopsy material to investigate the technical effects of sample preparation and the quantitative MS.

methodsWe studied the effect of tissue storage methods (TSMs) and tissue extraction methods (TEMs) on data analysis. There are two TSMs: frozen (FR) and FFPE (formalin-fixed paraffin embedded); and three TEMs: MAX, TX followed by MAX and SDS followed by MAX. We assessed the impact of different strategies to analyze the data while considering heterogeneity and MVs. We have used analysis of variance (ANOVA) model to study the effects due to various sources of variability. RESULTS AND

conclusionWe found that the FFPE TSM is better than the FR TSM. We also found that the one-step TEM (MAX) is better than those of two-steps TEMs. Furthermore, we found the imputation method is a better approach than excluding the proteins with MVs or using unbalanced design.

Indexed as

ANOVAImputationProteinsTechnical variabilityTissue extractionTissue storage

Identifiers

PMID32148359
PMCPMC7059694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.