ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2020
Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort-Derived Normative Ranges.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Value of MRCP+ And Liver Multiscan in the Management of Dominant Strictures in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Clinical Application of Annual Liver Multiscan and MRCP+ in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: the CATCH-IT Study
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pilot feasibility study to determine the utility of direct access and quantitative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the assessment of suspected acute biliary or ductal gallstone presentations.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Non-invasive Assessment of Pancreatic Duct Hypertension Using Computational Flow Modeling.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Periductal iron-corrected T1 is a predictor of adverse outcomes in large-duct primary sclerosing cholangitis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Effect of Preprocedural Consumption of Banana, Plain Dark Tea, or Nothing on MRCP Image Quality in Patients With Obstructive Jaundice.BioMed research international · 2026Observational
- Practical applications of AI in body imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Evaluating the role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in therapeutic decision-making for difficult common bile duct stones.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility and reference ranges of primary sclerosing cholangitis specific biomarkers from quantitative MRCP.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Quantitative MRCP as Part of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Standard of Care in the National Health Service in England: A Feasibility Assessment Among Hepatologists.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring the Role of MRCP+ for Enhancing Detection of High-Grade Strictures in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Unmet needs in autoimmune liver diseases.Current opinion in immunology · 2025Review
- Tracking free water in human body by magnetic resonance imaging: new insights on the network pathways.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Global research trends in surgical management of choledochal cysts: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Quantitative MRCP metrics as imaging biomarkers to differentiate benign from malignant bile duct obstructions.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-assisted Diagnosis of Extrahepatic Common Bile Duct Obstruction Using MRCP Imaging and Clinical Parameters.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Radical Resection After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-Emerging Technologies in Comprehensive Treatment Strategies.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- A Snapshot of Digital Transformation in Hepatology and Rare Liver Disease Related Health Care: A UK Perspective.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2023Article
- Diagnostic performance of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for the detection of choledocholithiasis in patients with negative MRCP.Updates in surgery · 2023Article
- A composite score using quantitative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography predicts clinical outcomes in primary sclerosing cholangitis.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2023Article
- Visual Image Annotation for Bowel Obstruction: Repeatability and Agreement with Manual Annotation and Neural Networks.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an important tool for noninvasive imaging of biliary disease, however, its assessment is currently subjective, resulting in the need for objective biomarkers. PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, scan/rescan repeatability, and cross-scanner reproducibility of a novel quantitative MRCP tool on phantoms and in vivo. Additionally, to report normative ranges derived from the healthy cohort for duct measurements and tree-level summary metrics. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. PHANTOMS/SUBJECTS: Phantoms: two bespoke designs, one with varying tube-width, curvature, and orientation, and one exhibiting a complex structure based on a real biliary tree. Subjects Twenty healthy volunteers, 10 patients with biliary disease, and 10 with nonbiliary liver disease. SEQUENCE/FIELD STRENGTH: MRCP data were acquired using heavily T ASSESSMENT: Digital instances of the phantoms were synthesized with varying resolution and signal-to-noise ratio. Physical 3D-printed phantoms were scanned across six scanners (two field strengths for each of three manufacturers). Human subjects were imaged on four scanners (two fieldstrengths for each of two manufacturers). STATISTICAL TESTS: Bland-Altman analysis and repeatability coefficient (RC).
resultsAccuracy of the diameter measurement approximated the scanning resolution, with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) from -1.1 to 1.0 mm. Excellent phantom repeatability was observed, with LoA from -0.4 to 0.4 mm. Good reproducibility was observed across the six scanners for both phantoms, with a range of LoA from -1.1 to 0.5 mm. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was high. Quantitative MRCP detected strictures and dilatations in the phantom with 76.6% and 85.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity in both. Patients and healthy volunteers exhibited significant differences in metrics including common bile duct (CBD) maximum diameter (7.6 mm vs. 5.2 mm P = 0.002), and overall biliary tree volume 12.36 mL vs. 4.61 mL, P = 0.0026). DATA
conclusionThe results indicate that quantitative MRCP provides accurate, repeatable, and reproducible measurements capable of objectively assessing cholangiopathic change. Evidence Level: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:807-820.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.