Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32147702›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2020

Neural Patterns are More Similar across Individuals during Successful Memory Encoding than during Failed Memory Encoding.

Griffin E Koch, John P Paulus, Marc N Coutanche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intersubject similarity in neural representations underlies shared episodic memory content.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Identifying causal subsequent memory effects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Age-related neural dedifferentiation for individual stimuli: an across-participant pattern similarity analysis.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Griffin E KochDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
John P PaulusDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Marc N CoutancheDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.

Funding

Predoctoral Training Program in Behavioral Brain ResearchT32GM081760 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FIEZ, JULIE A, HOLT, LORI L · 2007 to 2021
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM081760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After experiencing the same episode, some people can recall certain details about it, whereas others cannot. We investigate how common (intersubject) neural patterns during memory encoding influence whether an episode will be subsequently remembered, and how divergence from a common organization is associated with encoding failure. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging with intersubject multivariate analyses, we measured brain activity as people viewed episodes within wildlife videos and then assessed their memory for these episodes. During encoding, greater neural similarity was observed between the people who later remembered an episode (compared with those who did not) within the regions of the declarative memory network (hippocampus, posterior medial cortex [PMC], and dorsal Default Mode Network [dDMN]). The intersubject similarity of the PMC and dDMN was episode-specific. Hippocampal encoding patterns were also more similar between subjects for memory success that was defined after one day, compared with immediately after retrieval. The neural encoding patterns were sufficiently robust and generalizable to train machine learning classifiers to predict future recall success in held-out subjects, and a subset of decodable regions formed a network of shared classifier predictions of subsequent memory success. This work suggests that common neural patterns reflect successful, rather than unsuccessful, encoding across individuals.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAdultBrainDefault Mode NetworkFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingGyrus CinguliHippocampusHumansIndividualityMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryNeural PathwaysPrimary Visual Cortexencodingepisodic memoryhippocampusMVPArecall

Identifiers

PMID32147702
PMCPMC7264691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.