Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32146906›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2020

Reducing ignorance about who dies of what: research and innovation to strengthen CRVS systems.

Alan D Lopez, Deirdre McLaughlin, Nicola Richards

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alan D LopezMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia. alan.lopez@unimelb.edu.au.
Deirdre McLaughlinMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.
Nicola RichardsMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) agenda offers a major impetus to consolidate and accelerate development in civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems. Strengthening CRVS systems is an SDG outcome in itself. Moreover, CRVS systems are the best - if not essential - source of data to monitor and guide health policy debates and to assess progress towards numerous SDG targets and indicators. They also provide the necessary documentation and proof of identity for service access and are critical for disaster preparedness and response. While there has been impressive global momentum to improve CRVS systems over the past decade, several challenges remain. This article collection provides an overview of recent innovations, progress, viewpoints and key areas in which action is still required - notably around the need for better systems and procedures to notify the fact of death and to reliably diagnose its cause, both for deaths in hospital and elsewhere.

Indexed as

InventionsMortalityVital StatisticsData AccuracyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansResearchSustainable DevelopmentCause of deathCivil registration and vital statisticsData qualityGarbage codesMedical certificationMortalityNotificationProcess mapping.Sustainable development goalsVerbal autopsy

Identifiers

PMID32146906
PMCPMC7061482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.