Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32146664›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

2,4-D adsorption from agricultural subsurface drainage by canola stalk-derived activated carbon: insight into the adsorption kinetics models under batch and column conditions.

Mohammad Javad Amiri, Reza Roohi, Mohammad Arshadi, Alireza Abbaspourrad

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad Javad AmiriDepartment of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Fasa University, Fasa, 74616-86131, Iran. mj_amiri@fasau.ac.ir.
Reza RoohiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Fasa University, Fasa, 74616-86131, Iran.
Mohammad ArshadiDepartment of Food Science, College of Agricultural and Life Science, Cornell University, 243 Stocking Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Alireza AbbaspourradDepartment of Food Science, College of Agricultural and Life Science, Cornell University, 243 Stocking Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the experimental and kinetic modeling investigations were performed to evaluate the ability of mesoporous and microporous canola stalk-derived activated carbon (CSAC) on 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) removal from synthetic and natural water in both batch and continuous systems. Three empirical models (pseudo-first-order equation (PFOE), pseudo-second-order equation (PSOE), and the Elovich equation (EE)) and three theoretical models (film diffusion model (FDM), particle diffusion model (PDM), and second-order chemical reaction rate model (SOCRRM)) were compared in terms of diffusion coefficients, maximum 2,4-D adsorption, and rate constants at various operating conditions. CSAC was prepared at 600 °C and activated with water steam under a controlled flow and subsequently characterized by various analytical methods. The results showed that the maximum 2,4-D uptake by CSAC was achieved as 135.8 mg g

Indexed as

Water Purification2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic AcidAdsorptionCharcoalHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationKineticsThermodynamicsWater Pollutants, Chemical2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic AcidCharcoalWater Pollutants, Chemical2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acidCanola stalkEmpirical kinetic modelsMass balance equationTheoretical kinetic models

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.