Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32145983›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of emergency medicine2020

Ten Best Practices for Improving Emergency Medicine Provider-Nurse Communication.

A Zachary Hettinger, Natalie Benda, Emilie Roth, Daniel Hoffman, Akhila Iyer, Ella Franklin, Shawna Perry, R J Fairbanks, Ann M Bisantz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A Zachary HettingerNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC; Department of Emergency Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Natalie BendaNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC.
Emilie RothRoth Cognitive Engineering, Stanford, California.
Daniel HoffmanNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC.
Akhila IyerNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC.
Ella FranklinNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC.
Shawna PerryDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville Medical Center, Jacksonville, Florida.
R J FairbanksNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC; Department of Emergency Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York.
Ann M BisantzDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York.

Funding

Cognitive Engineering for Complex Decision Making & Problem Solving in Acute CareR01HS022542 · AHRQ · MEDSTAR HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HETTINGER, AARON ZACHARY · 2014 to 2018
$2.5M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current state of scientific knowledge regarding communication between emergency medicine (EM) providers indicates that communication is critical to safe and effective patient care.

objectivesIn this study, we identified communication needs of EM nurses and physicians; in particular, what information should be conveyed, when, how, and to whom.

methodsFive semi-structured focus groups and one interview were conducted with nine nurses, eight attending physicians, and four residents. Questions addressed how EM personnel use and share information about patients and clinical work, what information tends to be exchanged, and what additional information would be helpful to share. Sessions were audio recorded. Transcripts were generated and analyzed using a concept mapping approach (a visual qualitative analysis technique to represent and convey synthesized knowledge).

resultsEleven concept maps were produced summarizing: information physicians needed from nurses and vice versa; methods of communication that could be utilized; barriers or obstacles to effective communication; strategies to enhance or ensure effective communication; and environmental or situational factors that impact communication.

conclusionsOur main finding of this research is that communication ensures shared awareness of patient health status, the care plan, status of plan steps and orders, and, especially, any critical changes or "surprises" regarding the health of a patient. Additionally, the research identified shared information needs; communication methods, strategies and barriers; and factors affecting successful communication, and has implications for both system and training design. Key implications for emergency nursing practice from this research are distilled in 10 'best practice' strategies for improving EM nurse-physician communication.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmergency MedicineFocus GroupsHumansMedical Staff, HospitalQualitative Researchcommunication methodscommunication strategiesconcept mapsinformation needsnurse–physician communicationshared awareness

Identifiers

PMID32145983
PMCPMC9524543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.