Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32145477›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research2020

Psychometric properties of the Observable Social Cognition Rating Scale (OSCARS): Self-report and informant-rated social cognitive abilities in schizophrenia.

Tate F Halverson, Michal Hajdúk, Amy E Pinkham, Philip D Harvey, L Fredrik Jarskog, Lana Nye, David L Penn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. International perspective on social cognition in schizophrenia: current stage and the next steps.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tate F HalversonUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chapel Hill, NC, United States. Electronic address: tate.halverson@unc.edu.
Michal HajdúkDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia; Clinic of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia; Center for Psychiatric Disorders Research - UK, Science Park, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia.
Amy E PinkhamSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX; Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX.
Philip D HarveyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Research Service, Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL.
L Fredrik JarskogUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Psychiatric Research Center, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Lana NyeCollege of Social Work, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
David L PennUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Australian Catholic University, School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

Social Cognition Psychometric EvaluationR01MH093432 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HARVEY, PHILIP D., PENN, DAVID LEWIS · 2012 to 2016
$3.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) consistently show deficits in social cognition (SC) which is associated with real world outcomes. Psychosocial treatments have demonstrated reliable improvements in SC abilities, highlighting the need for accurate identification of SC deficits for efficient and individualized treatment planning. To this end, the Observable Social Cognition Rating Scale (OSCARS) is an 8-item scale with both self and informant versions. This study investigated psychometric properties of the OSCARS as both a self and informant-reported scale in a large sample of SSD (n = 382) and individuals without a psychiatric diagnosis (n = 289). A two-factor structure (Social Cognitive Bias and Social Cognitive Ability) of the OSCARS demonstrated acceptable model fit with good internal consistency for both self- and informant-report. The OSCARS had adequate convergent, external, and predictive validity. Area Under the Curve (AUC) values suggest the OSCARS has some value in identifying individuals with impaired SC and social competence, although stronger AUC values were demonstrated when identifying individuals with impaired real-world functioning. Overall, psychometric properties indicate the OSCARS may be a useful first-step tool for clinicians to detect functioning deficits in SSD and efficiently identify individuals in need of additional assessment or psychosocial interventions.

Identifiers

PMID32145477
PMCPMC7483899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.