Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32145271›Full record

ArticleBehavioural processes2020

Female degus show high sociality but no preference for familiar peers.

Nathan Insel, Katharine L Shambaugh, Annaliese K Beery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural processes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Familiarity and social relationships in degus (Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Social recognition and short-term memory in two taxa of striped mouse with differing social systems.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Characterization of social behavior in the spiny mouse,Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Neuroscientist's Guide to the Vole.Current protocols · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nathan InselDepartment of Psychology & Center for Structural and Functional Neuroscience, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.
Katharine L ShambaughDepartment of Psychology, Department of Biology, Program in Neuroscience. Smith College, Northampton, MA, 01063, USA.
Annaliese K BeeryDepartment of Psychology, Department of Biology, Program in Neuroscience. Smith College, Northampton, MA, 01063, USA. Electronic address: abeery@smith.edu.

Funding

Reward mechanisms supporting affiliation between peersR15MH113085 · NIMH · SMITH COLLEGE · PI BEERY, ANNALIESE K. · 2017 to 2017
$361k
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH113085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group-living animals vary in social behavior across multiple dimensions, including in the selectivity of social interactions with familiar versus unfamiliar peers. Standardized behavioral tests can be used to tease apart different dimensions of behavior. These serve a dual function-on one hand, helping to isolate behavioral factors that may support collective behavior in natural habitats, and, on another, providing a basis for comparative approaches to understanding physiological mechanisms of behavior. Degus (Octodon degus) are South American caviomorph rodents that nest and forage in groups with relatively low genetic relatedness. Flexibility in group membership is likely supported by gregariousness toward strangers, but the relative preference for strangers compared with familiar individuals has not been systematically tested. We assessed the specificity of social preferences in female degus using a same-sex partner preference test. Degus huddled extensively with both familiar and unfamiliar peers, with no average preference for one over the other. Detailed analysis of social interactions demonstrated an effect of familiarity on social investigation and aggressive behaviors, indicating that degus distinguished between familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics, even though it did not impact huddling. This behavioral profile is thus far unique to degus; in similar tests, meadow and prairie voles exhibit strong partner preferences for known peers, while mice exhibit low social huddling and spend relatively less time in social chambers. Understanding how group-living species differ in specific aspects of social behavior such as familiarity/novelty preference and propensity for social contact will offer a foundation to interpret differences in neural systems supporting sociality.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorRecognition, PsychologySocial BehaviorAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleMiceOctodonAffiliationDeguFamiliarityOctodondegusPartner preferencePartner preference testSocial behaviorSociality

Identifiers

PMID32145271
PMCPMC7164678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.