Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32145191›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2020

Predicting Confined 1D Cell Migration from Parameters Calibrated to a 2D Motor-Clutch Model.

Louis S Prahl, Maria R Stanslaski, Pablo Vargas, Matthieu Piel, David J Odde

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Models of Cellular Mechanosensation.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Multiscale models of integrins and cellular adhesions.Current opinion in structural biology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Stick-slip model for actin-driven cell protrusions, cell polarization, and crawling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Louis S PrahlDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Maria R StanslaskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Pablo VargasInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR 144 and Institut Pierre-Gilles de Gennes, PSL Research University, Paris, France; INSERM U932 Immunité et Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Matthieu PielInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR 144 and Institut Pierre-Gilles de Gennes, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
David J OddeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Physical Sciences-Oncology Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: oddex002@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Project 2: Cell Migration in Mechanically Complex MicroenvironmentsU54CA210190 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LARGAESPADA, DAVID ANDREW, ODDE, DAVID J. · 2016 to 2020
$10.0M
Modeling and microsystems approach to glioma invasionR01CA172986 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ODDE, DAVID J., ROSENFELD, STEVEN S · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172986NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological tissues contain micrometer-scale gaps and pores, including those found within extracellular matrix fiber networks, between tightly packed cells, and between blood vessels or nerve bundles and their associated basement membranes. These spaces restrict cell motion to a single-spatial dimension (1D), a feature that is not captured in traditional in vitro cell migration assays performed on flat, unconfined two-dimensional (2D) substrates. Mechanical confinement can variably influence cell migration behaviors, and it is presently unclear whether the mechanisms used for migration in 2D unconfined environments are relevant in 1D confined environments. Here, we assessed whether a cell migration simulator and associated parameters previously measured for cells on 2D unconfined compliant hydrogels could predict 1D confined cell migration in microfluidic channels. We manufactured microfluidic devices with narrow channels (60-μm

Indexed as

CytoskeletonGliomaCell MovementExtracellular MatrixHumansMicrofluidics

Identifiers

PMID32145191
PMCPMC7136340
OpenAlexW3008551438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.