Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32145020›Full record

ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Institute2020

Putting the Pieces Together: Completing the Mechanism of Action Jigsaw for Sipuleucel-T.

Ravi A Madan, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Charles G Drake, Lawrence Fong, Evan Y Yu, Douglas G McNeel, Daniel W Lin, Nancy N Chang, Nadeem A Sheikh, James L Gulley

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Cancer Vaccines: Mobilizing Immunity for Targeted Cancer Therapy.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Immunotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ravi A MadanCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Emmanuel S AntonarakisJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Charles G DrakeColumbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lawrence FongHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Evan Y YuUniversity of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA.
Douglas G McNeelUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.
Daniel W LinUniversity of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nancy N ChangDendreon Pharmaceuticals LLC, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nadeem A SheikhDendreon Pharmaceuticals LLC, Seattle, WA, USA.
James L GulleyCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Dendreon (United States) · USNational Institutes of Health · USSeattle Cancer Care Alliance · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · US

Funding

Cancer Therapy Clinical Trials Using Novel Recombinant VaccinesZIABC010666 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GULLEY, JAMES L. · 2009 to 2025
$22.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sipuleucel-T is an autologous cellular immunotherapy that induces an immune response targeted against prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) to treat asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In the phase III IMPACT study, sipuleucel-T was associated with a statistically significantly increased overall survival (OS) (median = 4.1 months) vs placebo. Patients with baseline prostate-specific antigen levels in the lowest quartile (≤22.1 ng/mL) exhibited a 13-month improvement in OS with sipuleucel-T. Together, this led sipuleucel-T to be approved and recommended as first-line therapy in various guidelines for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This review discusses the varied findings about the mechanisms of action of sipuleucel-T, bringing them together to form a more coherent picture. These pieces include inducing a statistically significant increase in antigen-presenting cell activation; inducing a peripheral immune response specific to the target (PAP) and/or immunizing (PA2024) antigens; stimulating systemic cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity; and mediating antigen spread (ie, increased antibody responses to secondary proteins in addition to PAP and PA2024). Each of these pieces individually correlates with OS. Sipuleucel-T also traffics T cells to the prostate and is associated with long-term immune memory such that a second course of treatment induces an anamnestic immune response. Prostate cancer does not have a strongly inflamed microenvironment, thus its response to immune checkpoint inhibitors is limited. Because sipuleucel-T is able to traffic T cells to the tumor, it may be an ideal combination partner with immunotherapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors or with radiation therapy.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTissue ExtractsCancer Vaccinessipuleucel-TTissue Extracts

Identifiers

PMID32145020
PMCPMC7301097
OpenAlexW3010126252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.