Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32144855›Full record

ArticleThe FEBS journal2020

Mitotic entry upon Topo II catalytic inhibition is controlled by Chk1 and Plk1.

Maria Arroyo, Ana Cañuelo, Jesús Calahorra, Florian D Hastert, Antonio Sánchez, Duncan J Clarke, J Alberto Marchal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The FEBS journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria ArroyoDepartamento de Biología Experimental, Universidad de Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5837-8060
Ana CañueloDepartamento de Biología Experimental, Universidad de Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5626-4484
Jesús CalahorraDepartamento de Biología Experimental, Universidad de Jaén, Spain.
Florian D HastertDepartment of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Antonio SánchezDepartamento de Biología Experimental, Universidad de Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6715-8158
Duncan J ClarkeDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Alberto MarchalDepartamento de Biología Experimental, Universidad de Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2008-610X
Universidad de Jaén · ESTechnische Universität Darmstadt · DEUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Control of Chromosome Segregation by DNA Topoisomerase IIR01GM130858 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DUNCAN J. CLARKE · 2019 to 2026
$2.2M
Regulation of kinetochore function by Topoisomerase IIR01GM112793 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI AZUMA, YOSHIAKI, CLARKE, DUNCAN J. · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112793NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catalytic inhibition of topoisomerase II during G2 phase delays onset of mitosis due to the activation of the so-called decatenation checkpoint. This checkpoint is less known compared with the extensively studied G2 DNA damage checkpoint and is partially compromised in many tumor cells. We recently identified MCPH1 as a key regulator that confers cells with the capacity to adapt to the decatenation checkpoint. In the present work, we have explored the contributions of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) and polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1), in order to better understand the molecular basis of decatenation checkpoint. Our results demonstrate that Chk1 function is required to sustain the G2 arrest induced by catalytic inhibition of Topo II. Interestingly, Chk1 loss of function restores adaptation in cells lacking MCPH1. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Plk1 function is required to bypass the decatenation checkpoint arrest in cells following Chk1 inhibition. Taken together, our data suggest that MCPH1 is critical to allow checkpoint adaptation by counteracting Chk1-mediated inactivation of Plk1. Importantly, we also provide evidence that MCPH1 function is not required to allow recovery from this checkpoint, which lends support to the notion that checkpoint adaptation and recovery are different mechanisms distinguished in part by specific effectors.

Indexed as

BiocatalysisCell Cycle ProteinsCell LineCheckpoint Kinase 1Cytoskeletal ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIFlow CytometryG2 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHumansImmunoblottingMitosisPolo-Like Kinase 1Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1CHEK1 protein, humanCytoskeletal ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIMCPH1 protein, humanPolo-Like Kinase 1Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsTopoisomerase II Inhibitorscheckpoint adaptationChk1MCPH1Plk1topoisomerase II

Identifiers

PMID32144855
PMCPMC7483426
OpenAlexW3009390733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.