ArticleProteins2020
Energy-based graph convolutional networks for scoring protein docking models.
Article in Proteins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- EquiRank: Improved protein-protein interface quality estimation using protein language-model-informed equivariant graph neural networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunities.Cell · 2024Article
- Recent advances and challenges in protein complex model accuracy estimation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- How to Build the Virtual Cell with Artificial Intelligence: Priorities and Opportunities.ArXiv · 2024Article
- EGG: Accuracy Estimation of Individual Multimeric Protein Models Using Deep Energy-Based Models and Graph Neural Networks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Estimating the Accuracy of Protein Quaternary Structure Models.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Predicting transcriptional activation domain function using Graph Neural Networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Leveraging machine learning models for peptide-protein interaction prediction.RSC chemical biology · 2024Review
- Article
- Super High-Throughput Screening of Enzyme Variants by Spectral Graph Convolutional Neural Networks.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
- A gated graph transformer for protein complex structure quality assessment and its performance in CASP15.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Critical Assessment of Methods for Predicting the 3D Structure of Proteins and Protein Complexes.Annual review of biophysics · 2023Review
- PIQLE: protein-protein interface quality estimation by deep graph learning of multimeric interaction geometries.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- DeepRank-GNN: a graph neural network framework to learn patterns in protein-protein interfaces.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- GDockScore: a graph-based protein-protein docking scoring function.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- Improving classification of correct and incorrect protein-protein docking models by augmenting the training set.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- PIQLE: protein-protein interface quality estimation by deep graph learning of multimeric interaction geometries.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- Deep Local Analysis evaluates protein docking conformations with locally oriented cubes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Cross-modality and self-supervised protein embedding for compound-protein affinity and contact prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Identification of risk genes for Alzheimer's disease by gene embedding.Cell genomics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Structural information about protein-protein interactions, often missing at the interactome scale, is important for mechanistic understanding of cells and rational discovery of therapeutics. Protein docking provides a computational alternative for such information. However, ranking near-native docked models high among a large number of candidates, often known as the scoring problem, remains a critical challenge. Moreover, estimating model quality, also known as the quality assessment problem, is rarely addressed in protein docking. In this study, the two challenging problems in protein docking are regarded as relative and absolute scoring, respectively, and addressed in one physics-inspired deep learning framework. We represent protein and complex structures as intra- and inter-molecular residue contact graphs with atom-resolution node and edge features. And we propose a novel graph convolutional kernel that aggregates interacting nodes' features through edges so that generalized interaction energies can be learned directly from 3D data. The resulting energy-based graph convolutional networks (EGCN) with multihead attention are trained to predict intra- and inter-molecular energies, binding affinities, and quality measures (interface RMSD) for encounter complexes. Compared to a state-of-the-art scoring function for model ranking, EGCN significantly improves ranking for a critical assessment of predicted interactions (CAPRI) test set involving homology docking; and is comparable or slightly better for Score_set, a CAPRI benchmark set generated by diverse community-wide docking protocols not known to training data. For Score_set quality assessment, EGCN shows about 27% improvement to our previous efforts. Directly learning from 3D structure data in graph representation, EGCN represents the first successful development of graph convolutional networks for protein docking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.