Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32144746›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2020

Medication Adherence and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated with Oral Prostacyclins: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Bonnie B Dean, Vishal Saundankar, Dana Stafkey-Mailey, Rebekah H Anguiano, Andrew C Nelsen, Kathryn Gordon, Peter Classi

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Oral Prostacyclin Pathway Agents Used in PAH: A Targeted Literature Review.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bonnie B DeanXcenda, LLC, Palm Harbor, FL, USA. bonnie.dean@xcenda.com.
Vishal SaundankarXcenda, LLC, Palm Harbor, FL, USA.
Dana Stafkey-MaileyXcenda, LLC, Palm Harbor, FL, USA.
Rebekah H AnguianoCollege of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Andrew C NelsenUnited Therapeutics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Kathryn GordonUnited Therapeutics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Peter ClassiUnited Therapeutics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
United Therapeutics (United States) · USTriangle · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

United Therapeutics Corporation Funding to XcendaUnited Therapeutics Corporation LLC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the improved convenience of oral prostacyclins, there is a shift toward their use in treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

objectivesOur objective was to compare patient characteristics, medication adherence, healthcare resource use (HCRU), and costs among patients receiving oral treprostinil or selexipag.

methodsWe used Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases to identify patients with PAH with a diagnosis code for pulmonary hypertension (PH) plus a prescription for oral treprostinil or selexipag from July 2013 to September 2017. Medication adherence, persistence, and all-cause and PAH-related HCRU and costs were compared between cohorts during the 6-month follow-up. Adjusted healthcare costs were obtained using recycled predictions and bootstrapped samples.

resultsA total of 256 (130 oral treprostinil, 126 selexipag) patients fulfilled the study criteria. The oral treprostinil cohort was more likely to be male, to have previously used parenteral prostacyclins, and to have higher outpatient costs at baseline than the selexipag cohort. During follow-up, both cohorts had similar proportions of patients who were adherent to and persistent with their respective therapies. All-cause and PAH-related medical utilization was generally similar between cohorts. The oral treprostinil cohort had 66.9% lower total PAH-related healthcare costs (mean difference - $75,183; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 102,584 to - 49,771) and 70.6% lower PAH-related pharmacy costs (mean difference - $76,439; 95% CI - 104,512 to - 51,458) than the selexipag cohort, with similar differences in all-cause healthcare and pharmacy costs.

conclusionsLower all-cause and PAH-related total healthcare and pharmacy costs were observed in patients receiving oral treprostinil compared with those receiving selexipag. It will be important to study longer-term costs and clinical outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID32144746
PMCPMC7392967
OpenAlexW3012388310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.