Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32144555›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2020

Comparison of total endoscopic thyroidectomy with conventional open thyroidectomy for treatment of papillary thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wen-Jie Jiang, Pei-Jing Yan, Chun-Lin Zhao, Mou-Bo Si, Wen Tian, Yan-Jun Zhang, Hong-Wei Tian, Shuang-Wu Feng, Cai-Wen Han, Jia Yang and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Conversion rates in robotic thyroid surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Jie JiangThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Pei-Jing YanInstitution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Chun-Lin ZhaoAffiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, People's Republic of China.
Mou-Bo SiThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Wen TianDepartment of General Surgery, First Clinical Center, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100000, People's Republic of China.
Yan-Jun ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, First Clinical Center, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100000, People's Republic of China.
Hong-Wei TianDepartment of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Shuang-Wu FengThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Cai-Wen HanDepartment of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Jia YangDepartment of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Ke-Hu YangThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China. kehuyangebm2006@163.com.
Tian-Kang GuoThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China. TiankangGuo2018@163.com.
Gansu Provincial Hospital · CNLanzhou University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNGansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the fact that thyroid surgery has evolved towards minimal incisions and endoscopic approaches, the role of total endoscopic thyroidectomy (TET) in thyroid cancer has been highly disputed. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses of peer reviewed studies in order to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of TET compared with conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC).

methodMedical literature databases such as PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of science were systematically searched for articles that compared TET and COT in PTC treatment from database inception until March 2019. The quality of the studies included in the review was evaluated using the Downs and Black scale using Review Manager software Stata V.13.0 for the meta-analysis.

resultsThe systematic review and meta-analysis were based on 5664 cases selected from twenty publications. Criteria used to determine surgical completeness included postoperative thyroglobulin (TG) levels, recurrence of the tumor after long-term follow-up. Adverse event and complication rate scores included transient recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy, permanent RLN palsy, transient hypocalcaemia, permanent hypocalcaemia, operative time, number of removed lymph nodes, length of hospital stay and patient cosmetic satisfaction. TET was found to be generally equivalent to COT in terms of surgical completeness and adverse event rate, although TET resulted in lower levels of transient hypocalcemia (OR 1.66; p < 0.05), a smaller number of the retrieved lymph nodes (WMD 0.46; p < 0.05), and better cosmetic satisfaction (WMD 1.73; p < 0.05). COT was associated with a shorter operation time (WMD - 50.28; p < 0.05) and lower rates of transient RLN palsy (OR 0.41; p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe results show that in terms of safety and efficacy, TET was similar to COT for the treatment of thyroid cancer. Indeed, the tumor recurrence rates and the level of surgical completeness in TET are similar to those obtained for COT. TET was associated with significantly lower levels of transient hypocalcemia and better cosmetic satisfaction, and thus is the better option for patients with cosmetic concerns. Overall, randomized clinical trials and studies with larger patient cohorts and long-term follow-up data are required to further demonstrate the value of the TET.

Indexed as

AdultEndoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedThyroid Cancer, PapillaryThyroidectomyThyroid NeoplasmsLaparoscopyMeta-analysisOpenRecurrence rateThyroid cancerThyroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID32144555
OpenAlexW3009566960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.