Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32144524›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020

Outcomes of ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients with different hormonal receptor profiles.

Jacques Balayla, Togas Tulandi, William Buckett, Hananel Holzer, Naama Steiner, Guy Shrem, Alexander Volodarsky-Perel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Radiology and oncology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacques BalaylaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Blvd., Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Togas TulandiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Blvd., Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
William BuckettDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Blvd., Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Hananel HolzerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Blvd., Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Naama SteinerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Blvd., Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Guy ShremDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Blvd., Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Alexander Volodarsky-PerelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Blvd., Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. alexander.volodarsky-perel@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7901-3370
McGill University · CAHadassah Medical Center · ILMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate fertility preservation outcomes in breast cancer women with different hormonal receptor profiles before oncological treatment.

methodsThe study population included women with a diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent fertility preservation from 2009 until 2018 at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital. Stimulation parameters and fertility preservation outcomes were compared among the following receptor-specific profile groups: (1) estrogen receptor positive (ER+) versus estrogen receptor negative (ER-), (2) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus estrogen and progesterone receptor positive (ER+/PR+), and (3) TNBC versus non-TNBC. Primary outcome was the total number of mature oocytes. Secondary outcomes included the number of retrieved oocytes, the peak estradiol level, and the number of follicles > 14 mm on the final oocyte maturation trigger day.

resultsA total of 155 cycles were included in the final analysis. These were divided into the exposure groups of ER+ (n = 97), ER- (n = 58), ER+/PR+ (n = 85), TNBC (n = 57), and non-TNBC (n = 98). Cycle outcomes revealed similar number of retrieved oocytes and follicles > 14 mm on the trigger day. Women with TNBC had significantly lower number of mature oocytes compared with those with ER + PR+ (7 (5-11) versus 9 (7-15); p = 0.02) and non-TNBC (7 (5-11) versus 9 (7-16); p = 0.01) status. Triple-negative breast cancer profile was associated with a significant reduction in the chance of developing over 10 mature oocytes (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19-0.92).

conclusionAmong the different hormonal receptor profiles in breast cancer, the TNBC subtype has a negative effect on fertility preservation outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultCryopreservationEstrogensFemaleFertility PreservationHumansOocyte RetrievalOocytesOvulation InductionReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsEstrogensReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneEstrogen receptorFertility preservationNumber of oocytesProgesterone receptorTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID32144524
PMCPMC7183026
OpenAlexW3009814246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.