Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32144474›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2020

Repair characteristics and time-dependent effects in response to heavy-ion beam irradiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a comparison with X-ray irradiation.

Xiaopeng Guo, Miaomiao Zhang, Yue Gao, Dong Lu, Wenjian Li, Libin Zhou

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to Ionizing Radiation inAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Modulation of the nanoscale motion rate ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Increased Water-Soluble YellowFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaopeng Guo *Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Miaomiao Zhang *Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Yue GaoInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Dong LuInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China. ld@impcas.ac.cn.
Wenjian LiInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Libin ZhouInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Institute of Modern Physics · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

Joint project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Industrial Technology Research Institute CAS-ITRI 2019012National Natural Science Foundation of China 11905265National Natural Science Foundation of China 11975284Science and Technology Program of Lanzhou, China 2019-1-39
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heavy-ion beam (HIB) irradiation has been widely used in microbial mutation breeding. However, a global cellular response to such radiation remains mostly uncharacterised. In this study, we used transcriptomics to analyse the damage repair response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae following a semi-lethal HIB irradiation (80 Gy), which induced a significant number of DNA double-strand breaks. Our analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from 50 to 150 min post-irradiation revealed that upregulated genes were significantly enriched for gene ontology and Kyoto encyclopaedia of genes and genomes terms related to damage repair response. Based on the number of DEGs, their annotation, and their relative expression, we established that the peak of the damage repair response occurred 75 min post-irradiation. Moreover, we exploited the data from our recent study on X-ray irradiation-induced repair to compare the transcriptional patterns induced by semi-lethal HIB and X-ray irradiations. Although these two radiations have different properties, we found a significant overlap (> 50%) for the DEGs associated with five typical DNA repair pathways and, in both cases, identified homologous recombination repair (HRR) as the predominant repair pathway. Nevertheless, when we compared the relative enrichment of the five DNA repair pathways at the key time point of the repair process, we found that the relative enrichment of HRR was higher after HIB irradiation than after X-ray irradiation. Additionally, the peak stage of HRR following HIB irradiation was ahead of that following X-ray irradiation. Since mutations occur during the DNA repair process, uncovering detailed repair characteristics should further the understanding of the associated mutagenesis features.

Indexed as

Heavy IonsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairGene Expression ProfilingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTime FactorsX-RaysCellular repairHeavy-ion beam irradiationRNA-seqSaccharomyces cerevisiaeX-ray irradiation

Identifiers

PMID32144474
OpenAlexW3010140576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.