Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32144438›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2020

Tripping on nothing: placebo psychedelics and contextual factors.

Jay A Olson, Léah Suissa-Rocheleau, Michael Lifshitz, Amir Raz, Samuel P L Veissière

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Concomitant use of antidepressants and classic psychedelics: A scoping review.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2020
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jay A OlsonDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, 1033 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A1, Canada. jay.olson@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1161-5209
Léah Suissa-RocheleauDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 Avenue McGill College, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada.
Michael LifshitzDepartment of Anthropology, Stanford University, Main Quad, Building 50, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Amir RazDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, 1033 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A1, Canada.
Samuel P L VeissièreDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, 1033 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A1, Canada.
McGill University · CAChapman University · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleIs it possible to have a psychedelic experience from a placebo alone? Most psychedelic studies find few effects in the placebo control group, yet these effects may have been obscured by the study design, setting, or analysis decisions.

objectiveWe examined individual variation in placebo effects in a naturalistic environment resembling a typical psychedelic party.

methodsThirty-three students completed a single-arm study ostensibly examining how a psychedelic drug affects creativity. The 4-h study took place in a group setting with music, paintings, coloured lights, and visual projections. Participants consumed a placebo that we described as a drug resembling psilocybin, which is found in psychedelic mushrooms. To boost expectations, confederates subtly acted out the stated effects of the drug and participants were led to believe that there was no placebo control group. The participants later completed the 5-Dimensional Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale, which measures changes in conscious experience.

resultsThere was considerable individual variation in the placebo effects; many participants reported no changes while others showed effects with magnitudes typically associated with moderate or high doses of psilocybin. In addition, the majority (61%) of participants verbally reported some effect of the drug. Several stated that they saw the paintings on the walls "move" or "reshape" themselves, others felt "heavy… as if gravity [had] a stronger hold", and one had a "come down" before another "wave" hit her.

conclusionUnderstanding how context and expectations promote psychedelic-like effects, even without the drug, will help researchers to isolate drug effects and clinicians to maximise their therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

CreativitySocial EnvironmentAdolescentAdultConsciousnessEmotionsFemaleHallucinogensHumansMaleMusicPlacebo EffectRecreationYoung AdultHallucinogensContact highContextExpectationPlacebo effectsPsilocybinSetting

Identifiers

PMID32144438
OpenAlexW3010491167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.