Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32144359›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Cutaneous optical coherence tomography for longitudinal volumetric assessment of intradermal volumes in a mouse model.

Kornelia Schuetzenberger, Martin Pfister, Alina Messner, Gerhard Garhöfer, Christine Hohenadl, Ulrike Pfeiffenberger, Leopold Schmetterer, René M Werkmeister

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kornelia SchuetzenbergerMedical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Martin PfisterMedical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0943-4644
Alina MessnerMedical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Gerhard GarhöferMedical University of Vienna, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Christine HohenadlChristian Doppler Laboratory for Ocular and Dermal Effects of Thiomers, Vienna, Austria.
Ulrike PfeiffenbergerMedical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Leopold SchmettererMedical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
René M WerkmeisterMedical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. rene.werkmeister@meduniwien.ac.at.
Christian Doppler Laboratory for Thermoelectricity · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATCroma Pharma (Austria) · ATNanyang Technological University · SGTU Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical evaluation of skin lesions requires precise and reproducible technologies for their qualitative and quantitative assessment. In this study, we investigate the applicability of a custom-built dermatologic OCT system for longitudinal assessment of intradermal volumes in a mouse model. The OCT, based on an akinetic swept laser working at 1310 nm was employed for visualization and quantification of intradermal deposits of three different hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel formulations - one commercial and two test substances. Hydrogels were applied in 22 BALB/c mice, and measurements were performed over a six-month time period. All hydrogels increased in volume within the first weeks and degraded steadily thereafter. The half-lifes of the test hydrogels (27.2 ± 13.6 weeks for Hydrogel 1, 31.5 ± 17.2 weeks for Hydrogel 2) were higher in comparison to the commercially available HA hydrogel (21.4 ± 12.0 weeks), although differences were not significant. The sphericity parameter was used for evaluation of the deposit geometry. While on the injection day the sphericities were similar (~0.75 ± 0.04), at later time points significant differences between the different test substances were found (T24: PRV 0.59 ± 0.09, Hydrogel 1 0.70 ± 0.11, Hydrogel 2 0.78 ± 0.07; p ≤ 0.012 for all pairs). This study shows the applicability of OCT imaging for quantitative assessment of the volumetric behavior of intradermal deposits in vivo.

Indexed as

Tomography, Optical CoherenceAnimalsBiopsyCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHydrogelsImaging, Three-DimensionalImmunohistochemistryMiceSkinHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID32144359
PMCPMC7060266
OpenAlexW3010310863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.