Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32144049›Full record

ArticleClinical genitourinary cancer2020

Effects of Bladder Cancer on UK Healthcare Costs and Patient Health-Related Quality of Life: Evidence From the BOXIT Trial.

Edward Cox, Pedro Saramago, John Kelly, Nuria Porta, Emma Hall, Wei Shen Tan, Mark Sculpher, Marta Soares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Economic Impact of Bladder Cancer in the USA.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edward CoxCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom. Electronic address: edward.cox@york.ac.uk.
Pedro SaramagoCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
John KellyDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Nuria PortaClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Emma HallClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Wei Shen TanDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.
Mark SculpherCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Marta SoaresCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25351Cancer Research UK 5669Cancer Research UK C8262/A5669Cancer Research UK CRUK 07/004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited evidence exists regarding the cost and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) effects of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrence and progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We examined these effects using evidence from a recent randomized control trial. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe costs and HRQoL associated with bladder cancer were assessed using data from the BOXIT trial (bladder COX-2 inhibition trial; n = 472). The cost and HRQoL effects from clinical events were estimated using generalized estimating equations. The costs were derived from the recorded resource usage and UK unit costs. HRQoL was assessed using the EQ-5D-3L and reported UK preference tariffs. The events were categorized using the TMN classification.

resultsCases of grade 3 recurrence and progression were associated with statistically significant HRQoL decrements (-0.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.13 to -0.03; and -0.10; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.03, respectively). The 3-year average cost per NMIBC patient was estimated at £8735 (95% CI, 8325-9145). Cases of grade 1, 2, and 3 recurrence were associated with annual cost effects of £1218 (95% CI, 403-2033), £1677 (95% CI, 920-2433), and £3957 (95% CI, 2332-5583), respectively. Progression to MIBC was associated with an average increase in costs of £5407 (95% CI, 2663-8152).

conclusionEvidence from the BOXIT trial suggests that patients with NMIBC will both experience decrements in HRQoL and incur significant costs, especially in the event of a grade 3 recurrence or a progression to MIBC.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsQuality of LifeAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth ResourcesHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited KingdomUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCostHRQoLNMIBCQALYRCT

Identifiers

PMID32144049
PMCPMC7427321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.