ArticleTrials2020
A study of capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy is non-inferior to conventional chemotherapy as maintenance strategy in responders after induction therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03158610 (Biological-guided Metronomic Chemotherapy as Maintenance Strategy in Responders After Induction Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Biological-guided Metronomic Chemotherapy as Maintenance Strategy in Responders After Induction Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib plus capecitabine as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intravenous chemotherapy: a two-stage, single-armed, phase II study.Investigational new drugs · 2025Trial
- Employing nullclines to balance treatment efficacy and neurotoxicity for sustained tumor control.Mathematical biosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study is to demonstrate that capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy is non-inferior to capecitabine conventional chemotherapy as maintenance treatment, in patients who have responded to 16-18 weeks first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
methodsThe study design is a prospective, randomized, open label, phase II clinical trial. Those patients with mCRC who respond well after 16-18 weeks of standard doublet chemotherapy as induction may be enrolled into this study, and randomly assigned to the capecitabine metronomic group or standard dosage group. The duration of disease control after randomization and progression-free survival after enrollment are the primary endpoints. Overall survival, safety, and quality of life are the secondary endpoints. The sample size required to achieve the research objectives of this project is 79 patients in each group. The study recently started on 1 January 2018, and will last for 36 months. DISCUSSION: This project is intended to study the efficacy and safety of capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy in the maintenance treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, and to explore the strategy of "low toxicity, high efficiency, economy, and individualization", which is suitable for China's national conditions and pharmacoeconomics. It has great prospects for clinical application and a clear socioeconomic value.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03158610. Registered on 15 May 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.