Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32143644›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2020

Acceptability and appropriateness of a perinatal depression preventive group intervention: a qualitative analysis.

Alicia Diebold, Melissa Segovia, Jessica K Johnson, Aria Degillio, Dana Zakieh, Hee Jin Park, Kenneth Lim, S Darius Tandon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02979444 (Comparing the Effectiveness of Clinicians and Paraprofessionals to Reduce Disparities in Perinatal Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02979444 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing the Effectiveness of Clinicians and Paraprofessionals to Reduce Disparities in Perinatal Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2016 to 2020Enrolled874ConditionsPerinatal Depression, PostPartum DepressionArmsMothers and Babies Groups
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alicia DieboldCenter for Community Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Drive, Suite 643, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. alicia.diebold@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1085-9105
Melissa SegoviaCenter for Community Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Drive, Suite 680, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Jessica K JohnsonCenter for Community Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Drive, Suite 680, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Aria DegillioCenter for Community Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Drive, Suite 680, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Dana ZakiehCenter for Community Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Drive, Suite 680, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Hee Jin ParkCenter for Community Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Drive, Suite 680, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Kenneth LimCenter for Community Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Drive, Suite 680, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
S Darius TandonCenter for Community Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Drive, Suite 680, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute AD-1507-31473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerinatal depression is a prevalent public health concern. Although preventive interventions exist, there is limited literature on the acceptability and appropriateness of these interventions, especially those delivered by paraprofessionals. The Mothers and Babies Program (MB) is a group-based perinatal depression preventive intervention delivered prenatally. A cluster-randomized controlled trial examined the acceptability, appropriateness, and effectiveness of MB delivered by mental health professionals compared to paraprofessional staff from home visiting programs.

methodsThe full study enrolled 874 pregnant women. Fifty-three facilitators were trained and delivered the MB intervention to women in one of seven states in the United States. Semi-structured interviews were attempted with a randomly-selected subset of the full sample of pregnant women who received the MB intervention and with all facilitators. Specifically, interviews were conducted with 88 women who received the MB group intervention (45 in the paraprofessional-led arm and 43 in the mental health professional-led arm) and 46 women who facilitated the groups (27 home visiting staff and 19 mental health professionals). Interviews were conducted over the phone in English or Spanish and audio recorded. The recordings were translated into English, as needed, and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted using NVIVO to identify key themes related to intervention acceptability and appropriateness. Similarities and differences between study arms were explored.

resultsClients and facilitators found the MB content and group format acceptable. Challenges included maintaining group attendance, transportation issues, and managing group discussion. Overall, facilitators found the intervention appropriate for pregnant clients with some challenges presented for clients in crisis situations, experiencing housing instability, and with literacy and learning challenges. Participants provided suggestions for improvement, both for the course content and implementation. There were no significant differences found between study arms.

conclusionsOverall, clients and facilitators enjoyed MB irrespective of study arm, and facilitators found the intervention appropriate for the population. These findings add to the qualitative literature on perinatal depression preventive interventions, specifically those delivered by paraprofessionals.

trial registrationThis trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Initial post: December 1, 2016; identifier: NCT02979444).

Indexed as

Psychotherapy, GroupAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelDepressionFemaleHealth Services ResearchHouse CallsHumansMental Health ServicesMothersPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnant PeopleQualitative ResearchHome visitingImplementationPerinatal depressionQualitative analysis

Identifiers

PMID32143644
PMCPMC7060621
OpenAlexW3012380701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.