ArticleBMC ecology2020
American foulbrood in a honeybee colony: spore-symptom relationship and feedbacks.
Article in BMC ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Microbiome-Metabolome Analyses Reveal Compound Risks from Multiple-Generation Cocoon Accumulation in Honeybee Combs.Biology · 2026Article
- High prevalence of Paenibacillus larvae, the pathogenic agent of American foulbrood disease, in Palestinian honey bee colonies.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Effects of essential oils on foulbrood bacteria and honey bee workers (Frontiers in insect science · 2026Article
- Supersedure, mites, and visible disease in Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies explain differences in productivity and survival, but the effects may be difficult to see.Journal of economic entomology · 2025Article
- First report on isolation and characterization of Bacillus Sp. associated with honey bee brood disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effective adaptation of flight muscles to tebuconazole-induced oxidative stress in honey bees.Heliyon · 2025Article
- The Diagnostic Value of qPCR Quantification ofVeterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Actinomycetes associated with hymenopteran insects: a promising source of bioactive natural products.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- American Foulbrood-Old and Always New Challenge.Veterinary sciences · 2023Review
- Role of Honey Bee Gut Microbiota in the Control of American Foulbrood and European Foulbrood Diseases.Archives of Razi Institute · 2022Review
- The oral vaccination withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Novel TaqMan PCR Assay for the Quantification ofInsects · 2021Article
- American Foulbrood in the Czech Republic: ERIC II Genotype ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Antimicrobial Activity againstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Correction to: American foulbrood in a honeybee colony: spore-symptom relationship and feedbacks between disease and colony development.BMC ecology · 2020Article
- American foulbrood in a honeybee colony: spore-symptom relationship and feedbacks.BMC ecology · 2020Article
- Phages in Therapy and Prophylaxis of American Foulbrood - Recent Implications From Practical Applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe most severe bacterial disease of honeybees is American foulbrood (AFB). The epidemiology of AFB is driven by the extreme spore resilience, the difficulty of bees to remove these spores, and the considerable incidence of undetected spore-producing colonies. The honeybee collective defence mechanisms and their feedback on colony development, which involves a division of labour at multiple levels of colony organization, are difficult to model. To better predict disease outbreaks we need to understand the feedback between colony development and disease progression within the colony. We therefore developed Bayesian models with data from forty AFB-diseased colonies monitored over an entire foraging season to (i) investigate the relationship between spore production and symptoms, (ii) disentangle the feedback loops between AFB epidemiology and natural colony development, and (iii) discuss whether larger insect societies promote or limit within-colony disease transmission.
resultsRather than identifying a fixed spore count threshold for clinical symptoms, we estimated the probabilities around the relationship between spore counts and symptoms, taking into account modulators such as brood amount/number of bees and time post infection. We identified a decrease over time in the bees-to-brood ratio related to disease development, which should ultimately induce colony collapse. Lastly, two contrasting theories predict that larger colonies could promote either higher (classical epidemiological SIR-model) or lower (increasing spatial nest segregation and more effective pathogen removal) disease prevalence.
conclusionsAFB followed the predictions of the SIR-model, partly because disease prevalence and brood removal are decoupled, with worker bees acting more as disease vectors, infecting new brood, than as agents of social immunity, by removing infected brood. We therefore established a direct link between disease prevalence and social group size for a eusocial insect. We furthermore provide a probabilistic description of the relationship between AFB spore counts and symptoms, and how disease development and colony strength over a season modulate this relationship. These results help to better understand disease development within honeybee colonies, provide important estimates for further epidemiological modelling, and gained important insights into the optimal sampling strategy for practical beekeeping and honeybee research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.