Trial reportJournal of endourology2020
Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy.
Trial report in Journal of endourology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06266793 (Comparison of Lumenis Pulse 120H Moses 2.0 Holmium Laser vs. Olympus Soltive Thulium Fiber Laser for Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Lumenis Pulse 120H Moses 2.0 Holmium Laser vs. Olympus Soltive Thulium Fiber Laser for Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rethinking high-frequency lithotripsy: a review by EAU endourology group.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery.BMC urology · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of holmium laser with the Moses technology and regular mode for stone treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC urology · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Article
- Comparison of dusting and fragmentation techniques using an aspiration access sheath: an in vitro study.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Moses Pulse Modulation: An Evaluation of Whether This Is Hype or Breakthrough.Cureus · 2025Review
- A review of the Moses effect and its applications in endourology.Current urology · 2024Review
- Comparative study of thulium fiber laser versus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for ureteric stone management with semi-rigid ureteroscopy: A prospective, single-center study.Asian journal of urology · 2024Article
- Laser Technology Advancements in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy.Current urology reports · 2024Review
- Flexible ureteroscopic treatment of kidney stones: How do the new laser systems change our concepts?Asian journal of urology · 2024Review
- Navigating urolithiasis treatment: assessing the practicality and performance of thulium fiber laser, holmium YAG, and thulium YAG in real-world scenarios.World journal of urology · 2023Review
- SemirigidMaedica · 2023Article
- Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: Is it living up to the hype?Asian journal of urology · 2023Review
- Does Moses technology enhance the efficiency and outcomes of regular holmium laser lithotripsy? Results of a pooled analysis of comparative studies.Lasers in medical science · 2023Article
- Understanding the ablation rate of Holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers. Perspectives from an in vitro study.Urolithiasis · 2023Article
- Innovations in Kidney Stone Removal.Research and reports in urology · 2023Review
- Temperature effect of Moses™ 2.0 during flexible ureteroscopy: anCentral European journal of urology · 2023Article
- Introducing in clinical practice a new laser suction handpiece for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Urologia · 2022Article
- Moses and Moses 2.0 for Laser Lithotripsy: Expectations vs. Reality.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.