Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32142881›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Establishing norms for error-related brain activity during the arrow Flanker task among young adults.

Michael J Imburgio, Iulia Banica, Kaylin E Hill, Anna Weinberg, Dan Foti, Annmarie MacNamara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Error-related brain activity shapes the association between trait neuroticism and internalizing symptomatology in two tasks.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Errors elicit frontoparietal theta-gamma coupling that is modulated by endogenous estradiol levels.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The gray matter morphology associated with the electrophysiological response to errors in individuals with high trait anxiety.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael J ImburgioDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. Electronic address: mimburgi@tamu.edu.
Iulia BanicaDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Kaylin E HillDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Anna WeinbergDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Dan FotiDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Annmarie MacNamaraDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
McGill University · CAPurdue University West Lafayette · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Brain-Behavior Markers of Negative Affectivity, Comorbidity in Anxiety DisordersK23MH105553 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MACNAMARA, ANNMARIE EILEEN · 2015 to 2018
$648k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH105553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological assessments typically rely on self-report and behavioral measures. Augmenting these with neurophysiological measures of the construct in question may increase the accuracy and predictive power of these assessments. Moreover, thinking about neurophysiological measures from an assessment perspective may facilitate under-utilized research approaches (e.g., brain-based recruitment of participants). However, the lack of normative data for most neurophysiological measures has prevented the comparison of individual responses to the general population, precluding these approaches. The current work examines the distributions of two event-related potentials (ERPs) commonly used in individual differences research: the error-related negativity (ERN) and error positivity (Pe). Across three lab sites, 800 unselected participants between the ages of 18 and 30 performed the arrow version of a Flanker task while EEG was recorded. Percentile scores and distributions for ERPs on error trials, correct trials, and the difference (ΔERN, ΔPe; error minus correct) at Fz, Cz and Pz are reported. The 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile values for the ΔERN at Cz were -2.37 ​μV, -5.41 ​μV, and -8.65 ​μV, respectively. The same values for ΔPe at Cz were 7.51 ​μV, 11.18 ​μV, and 15.55 ​μV. Females displayed significantly larger ΔPe magnitudes and smaller ΔERN magnitudes than males. Additionally, normative data for behavioral performance (accuracy, post-error slowing, and reaction time) on the Flanker task is reported. Results provide a means by which ERN and Pe amplitudes of young adults elicited by the arrow Flanker task can be benchmarked, facilitating the classification of neural responses as 'large,' 'medium,' or 'small'. The ability to classify responses in this manner is a necessary step towards expanded use of these measures in assessment and research settings. These norms may not apply to ERPs elicited by other tasks, and future work should establish similar norms using other tasks.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleReference ValuesYoung AdultERNERPFlankerNormsPe

Identifiers

PMID32142881
PMCPMC7197955
OpenAlexW3010210985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.